JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.

WHAT’S DRIVING THE AMERICAN JEWISH CONVERSATION

I’m at an editors’ retreat in New York City, where we’re hatching ways to improve the Forward, so our regular edition of Forwarding will be back tomorrow. But, of course, we have the news of the assassination of Ismail Haniyeh, Hamas’ political chief, paired with an analysis from our senior columnist Rob Eshman.


This morning, I wanted to share with you another Forward newsletter: Antisemitism Notebook, hosted by my colleague Arno Rosenfeld. Check out the latest edition below, and subscribe to it here for free.  Arno, take it away…


***


This week, we’re looking at how Donald Trump talks about antisemitism. But first, an update on last week’s newsletter about Kamala Harris: On Thursday, the vice president and presumptive Democratic presidential nominee released a statement condemning pro-Hamas rhetoric by some protesters against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech to Congress. It concluded with a rather vague denunciation of “antisemitism, hate and violence of any kind.”


Speaking of Netanyahu, I examined his invocation of antisemitism in the speech.


And a reporting request: Did you use those blue tins to raise money for Israel as a kid? If yes, hit the button below!

UP FIRST

Former President Donald Trump at a Christian conference in Florida last week. (Photo: Getty Images)

Republicans have been trying to use antisemitism to win votes for years, following a roadmap created by former U.S. Rep. Liz Cheney. Cheney, who was drummed out of office for supporting the impeachment of former President Donald Trump over the Jan. 6 riot, was fond of saying that the Democratic Party is “the party of antisemitism, the party of infanticide, the party of socialism.”


Today’s Republicans are still working hard to paint antisemitism as a liberal problem. They’ve held a battery of congressional hearings accusing Ivy League university presidents of fostering a dangerous climate for Jewish students, and generally try to present antisemitism as a by-product of woke politics.


Trump has never been known for message discipline. But he is a master of metabolizing the issues that animate his political base and seems to be trying that with antisemitism.


Harris “doesn’t like Jewish people,” Trump told a Christian political conference Friday, ignoring the fact that she is married to one. “That’s the way it is, and that’s the way it’s always going to be. She’s not going to change.”


Trump, whose daughter Ivanka is a convert to Judaism, was teeing off Harris' decision to skip Netanyahu’s speech for a pre-scheduled Black sorority event. Earlier in the week he told voters in North Carolina that Harris was “totally against the Jewish people.”


Trump’s approach shares an element of President Joe Biden’s tendency to conflate Jews with Israel, but adds a transactional element. He sees American Jews as a single-issue constituency that only cares about Israel. And he seems eternally frustrated that 76% of Jews voted against him in 2020, something he has attributed to “either a total lack of knowledge or great disloyalty.”


He repeated the insult on Truth Social Friday, saying, “Any Jewish person who votes for Kamala, or a Democrat, should immediately have their head examined.”


A different audience?


Seems like a strange tactic to try to win over Jewish voters. But Trump may have someone else in mind: voters who are not Jewish but really like Jews.


“I’ll tell you, the evangelical Christians love Israel more than the Jews in this country,” Trump told Axios in 2021.


Many evangelicals are, indeed, enthusiastic Zionists, believing that the establishment of the modern state of Israel was a biblical prophecy. A Pew poll found more evangelicals expressing a positive view of Jews than any other religious group except Mormons.


This philosemitism is embraced by some Jews, including Elan Carr, Trump’s antisemitism envoy. Others worry that it’s based on broad-brush stereotypes — Jews are religiously observant and love Israel, for example — and can quickly become conditional when Jews fail to match those characteristics.


That’s how Trump can rail against the supposedly disloyal, ignorant and crazy majority of Jews while reassuring Ami Magazine that he is “not talking about Orthodox Jews.” And, similarly, how Doug Mastriano, the Christian nationalist state lawmaker in Pennsylvania, could launch his campaign for governor two years ago by donning a tallit and blowing the shofar before unleashing what critics viewed as a series of thinly veiled antisemitic insults toward his Jewish opponent, Josh Shapiro. An adviser called Shapiro, who keeps kosher, “at best a secular Jew.”


The former president also agreed Tuesday with Sid Rosenberg, a radio host who called Emhoff, Harris' husband, “a crappy Jew” and a “horrible Jew.”


Trump loves to play to his base. So his rhetoric around antisemitism may best be understood as a way of helping convince his existing supporters that they are on the right side of the “Jewish” issue, no matter what most Jews think, do and say.


READ MORE:

Is it antisemitic to criticize Josh Shapiro?

(Photo: Getty Images)

Only one of the people on Harris’ Veepstakes shortlist has been aggressively attacked for his positions on Israel and Gaza: Josh Shapiro, Pennsylvania’s Jewish governor. An online campaign called “No Genocide Josh” zeroes in on his opposition to a ceasefire and comparison of pro-Palestinian student protesters to white supremacists.


A Jewish Insider article questioned the motivations behind the campaign, saying that the “only Jewish official being considered by Harris” has been singled out over Israel. But Shapiro is not the only Jew under consideration. J.B. Pritzker, the governor of Illinois, is on the long list of possible picks — but has taken a softer approach to the war, and largely escaped left-wing ire over it.


So is it about identity or about policy? “Him being a pro-Israel Jew will make it harder for us to claim we’re the party to trust on standing with Israel,” the JI article quoted an unnamed Republican staffer saying. “Forget about claiming we’re the only party standing against antisemitism.”


Shapiro’s stance on the war and criticism of pro-Paletinian protesters have frayed his deep ties with Arab and Muslim leaders in his state, as I wrote about this weekend.


READ MORE:

NEWS & VIEWS

Naveed Khan, who goes by Khanverse, organized a conference about the “Jewish problem” last month. (Photo: Screenshot)

💢 Antisemitic activity: An array of antisemites gathered in Kentucky last month for a conference about the “Jewish problem,” something the Anti-Defamation League said was “unprecedented” because it went beyond past gatherings about Holocaust denial to have speakers focusing “their hostility so sharply on the mere existence of Jews.” Naveed Khan, an antisemitic podcaster and conspiracy theorist, said the Israel-Hamas war was his primary motive for organizing the event. Some progressive activists have warned about far-right groups trying to make common cause with the pro-Palestinian antiwar movement. (ADL)


​​​🕍 Synagogue smear: Unknown vandals defaced a synagogue and Jewish federation building in Pittsburgh, site of the deadliest antisemitic attack in U.S. history, overnight on Sunday. “Jews 4 Palestine” was sprayed on the Chabad of Squirrel Hill alongside an inverted red triangle, a symbol used by Hamas to denote military targets; “❤️ Jews, hate Zionism” was sprayed onto a federation sign. (Pittsburgh Jewish Chronicle)


📚 Author attacked: Gabrielle Zevin, author of the bestselling novel Tomorrow, and Tomorrow, and Tomorrow, has been boycotted for supposedly being a Zionist. But Zevin, who has Korean and Jewish heritage, has never spoken publicly about Israel or Zionism. (JTA)


🎒 Hostile homeroom: The Department of Education found that Jewish students in Monterey County, California, were subjected to pervasive antisemitic harassment over three years, citing swastika graffiti, a reference to Hitler and a verbal threat against Jews. School officials agreed to take 10 actions, including improving how staff respond to complaints. (Los Angeles Times)


🏛️ ‘Indifference’ investigated: Harvard asked a court to dismiss a civil rights lawsuit claiming discrimination against Jewish students, citing the university’s creation of an antisemitism task force and disciplinary action taken against students who participated in a tent encampment. “Harvard is clearly wrestling with these deeply troubling issues and events, the very opposite of deliberate indifference,” the school’s lawyer told a judge last week. (Bloomberg)


🥖 Olympic outrage: Some online observers found the Olympic opening ceremonies to be “anti-Christian” because of a scene that played on the Last Supper. At least one alt-right influencer baselessly blamed “a gay Jew” for the production. (Forward)

MAIL BAG

I asked what you thought about Harris' approach to antisemitism, which tends to be more expansive — and less connected to Israel — than Biden’s.


If she becomes president, I think Israel is in for real trouble, much more so than any previous administration. With two bad November choices, I think Trump is the better choice for the USA, and for the free world. — Brian Lass


I believe that a President Harris would approach antisemitism in an intelligent, sensitive, and nuanced manner that understands the difference between anti-Jewish hatred (which is sometimes, but not always, disguised as anti-Zionism) and legitimate criticism of Israel (i.e. its government, as distinguished from individual Israelis) that is based on a concern for the security of the Jewish people and compassion for innocent Palestinians. She would be a strong supporter of a two-state solution, and through her marriage to Doug Emhoff, she has an intimate and intelligent sounding board for helping her discern where the lines are drawn between anti-Zionism and antisemitism. — Mark Ehlers


I’m not at all comfortable with VP Harris’ stand on Israel and elusive support thereof! — Lis Kahn


Letters may be edited for length and clarity