Loading...
Message From the Editor
It was this past week in 2009 that an unknown hacker published a cache of emails from the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit in the UK. It was meant to be the hack that brought down climate science. But it made the research — and researchers — stronger than ever. Ten years later, we published a five-part series tracking the key players that manufactured the scandal that came to be known as “Climategate,” exploring how climate science has continued to advance and how Climategate’s myths haven’t aged well, and reflecting on DeSmog’s own modest role in puncturing the hot air around the scandal and our continued efforts to combat misinformation on climate change Have a story tip or feedback? Get in touch: editor@desmogblog.com. Thanks, Introducing Climategate @ 10— By Mat Hope (2 min. read) —On November 19, 2009, an unknown hacker published a cache of emails from the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit. It was meant to be the hack that brought down climate science. But it made the research — and researchers — stronger than ever. 10 years on, this five-part series looks back at the key players that manufactured the scandal that came to be known as 'Climategate'. READ MOREWhere Are the Ring-Leaders of the Manufactured Climategate Scandal Now?— By Richard Collett-White (12 min. read) —Ten years ago, leading climate scientists at the University of East Anglia had a mass of email correspondence stolen from their computers and broadcast around the world, in what became known as ‘Climategate’. Climate science deniers pounced on the leaked emails as supposed proof that scientists were manipulating data and creating panic about climate change out of nothing. READ MOREInterview: Climategate Felt Like a Disaster, But Climate Science Is Now Stronger Than Ever— By Sophie Yeo (4 min. read) —“There was this incredible hullabaloo,” says Robert Brulle, recalling the moment that the Climategate scandal broke, 10 years ago today. He remembers thinking that it was all much ado about nothing: a coordinated PR campaign by climate deniers to discredit the science of global warming. Brulle is a professor of sociology and environmental science at Drexel University in Pennsylvania, who has researched the environmentalism movement for more than two decades, and has focused in recent years on the funding of climate denial. In some sense, his prediction would be proven correct. READ MOREHere Are 3 Climategate Myths That Have Not Aged Well— By Dana Nuccitelli (7 min. read) —Excessive media coverage of an email hacking tilted the outcome of a critically important event against the victims of the crime. Sound familiar? In 2016, it happened to the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee. That was déjà vu for climate scientists, who seven years earlier had experienced a nearly identical chain of events leading up to the 2009 UN climate change conference in Copenhagen. READ MOREDeSmog Was Created to Combat Climategate-Style Misinformation. We’re Still Going— By Brendan DeMelle (4 min. read) —DeSmog was launched in January 2006 to call out the public relations industry for working with fossil fuel industry clients to sow doubt and seed misinformation about climate science. In those early years, we focused most of our attention on the merchants of doubt who were scuttling political action to address global warming in the United States. Little did we know that climate science denial was spreading throughout the English-speaking world, and we would have to follow it to the UK and beyond. READ MOREStanford Study Says Renewable Power Eliminates Argument for Using Carbon Capture with Fossil Fuels— By Justin Mikulka (7 min. read) —New research from Stanford University professor Mark Z. Jacobson questions the climate and health benefits of carbon capture technology against simply switching to renewable energy sources like wind and solar. Carbon capture technology is premised on two possible approaches to reducing climate pollution: removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere anywhere in the world, an approach generally known as direct air capture, or removing it directly from the emissions source, such as the smoke stack of a fossil fuel power plant. READ MORERachel Maddow’s New Book on Russia, Oil, and Politics Accidentally Had Perfect Timing With Trump Impeachment Inquiry— By Dana Drugmand (4 min. read) — |
Loading...
Loading...