Tuesday evening’s US presidential election debate was a crucial test for Kamala Harris as she attempts to keep Donald Trump from returning to the White House. In good news for all those worried that a re-elected Trump is a clear and present danger to American democracy and the future of the planet, the vice-president was, for almost all observers, the clear winner. Our panel of expert commentators thought so, too. (Although, as they noted, some clearer policy detail and big ideas wouldn’t have gone amiss either). Debating with a man like Trump is no easy task. Our US team offered a thorough debunking of his most erroneous statements, including those about infanticide, his handling of the “best” economy in US history and his already infamous claim that immigrants are eating Ohio residents’ pet cats and dogs. Several times, Trump strolled straight into Harris’s rhetorical traps, notably one about crowd sizes that provided good fodder for David Smith’s sketch of the debate. While Trump blustered, “Harris laughed derisively and rested her chin on her hand, glaring at Trump like a principal listening to the lame excuses of a student who burned down the school.” As Moira Donegan put it in another great column: “There was no bait she offered him that he didn’t take.” Though perhaps the killer blow on Tuesday wasn’t provided by Harris, but by “childless cat lady” Taylor Swift who, minutes after the broadcast was over, sent out her endorsement of Harris and urged fans to register to vote. Carter Sherman looked at what difference – if any – Swift’s backing could make, while Sian Cain was brilliant in analysing how “the most powerful musician that ever lived” was annoyed enough (by an AI-generated Trump endorsement) to break cover and publicly back Harris. It will be fascinating to see whether the debate (or indeed Swift’s intervention) does shift the dial. The race will probably remain on a knife-edge until polling day, and potentially beyond. As our interactive last week showed, the outcome is likely to be decided by just a handful of voters in the swing states. Last weekend I was in Austin, a blue city in a red state, for the Texas Tribune festival where politicians, journalists, artists, activists and people in business discussed the threat another Trump presidency would pose, including to the most important issue of our time, the climate crisis. (Guardian US was a media partner and programmed some excellent events.) Ahead of the presidential debate Bill McKibben set out the dangers: “If we elect Donald Trump … We may read our mistake in the geological record a million years hence.” Harris has some way to go on that front, too, but the stakes could not be higher. We’ll continue to put them at the forefront of our reporting until November. And maybe beyond. |