View this email in your browser

April Monthly Briefing: Resetting Purpose

Our views on what matters
It’s difficult to find an annual statement, company website, sustainability report, brand strategy or communications plan these days that doesn’t talk about ‘purpose’ in one way or another. On the one hand that’s great – it reflects a growing awareness and consciousness that the relationships we hold, the things we do, and what we create need to have meaning and a reason to exist. But ‘purpose’ as a term used in a corporate context is invariably misunderstood, misinterpreted and overused. We’d go as far as to say the concept is now contaminated – just witness the growing criticism of statements and claims put out by businesses as being ‘purpose-wash’.

This doesn’t mean we shouldn’t use the term; we should but do so honestly and authentically to describe the real reason an organisation, business or brand exists. As we called out in our ’10 Actions for Business in 2019’ we’ve called for ‘Purpose’ to be reset, to move away from being the latest corporate buzzword to something that fundamentally anchors an organisations values, relationships, products, services and operations in a common understanding of the role the organisation plays in society and the wider world beyond the need to make a profit.

This month we share a number of examples and ideas of how some businesses can – and are – doing just that, which will hopefully provide some inspiration and provocation.

Neil Davy
CEO, Corporate Citizenship

How Mars is embedding purpose and avoiding “purpose-washing”


Mars takes the purpose agenda seriously, including measureable targets to deliver “The world we want tomorrow starts with how we do business today”.

Read More

Google undermines its mission by blocking ads for anti-censorship in China


Google stopped distributing advertisements in China for two anti-censorship websites, challenging its expansion ambitions and pitching profit against purpose.

Read More

Patagonia to focus on selling exclusively to “mission-driven companies”


Sustainability pioneer Patagonia is taking real action based on its purpose, having announced that it will supply only to those who demonstrate specific sustainability standards.

Read More

Purposeful purpose or purpose puffery?


At Corporate Citizenship, we believe that corporate purpose should be seen as a lightning rod for why a company exists, and this is fundamental in an era when trust in business is on the line. 

Read More

Purpose in action: Lessons for organisational change


The Chief Purpose Officer for Tate & Lyle Plc, Graham Abbey, explains some purpose approaches and how these will make a greater positive impact in the world, and profitably grow their business.

Read More

Climate Change: Breakfast invitation


Join us for a breakfast event on Tuesday, 11 June 2019 based on practical action that will help your business identify the risks and opportunities by bringing them to life through scenario analysis.

Read More and RVSP
Copyright © 2019 Corporate Citizenship. All rights reserved.

Contact us:
London: 5th Floor Holborn Gate, 326-330 Holborn Gate, London, WC1V 7PP  
 +44 (0)20 7861 1616 mail@corporate-citizenship.com
Melbourne: Unit 3, Level 7, 60 Albert Road, South Melbourne, Victoria, 3205 
+61 (0) 3 8639 0548 australia@corporate-citizenship.com
New York: 440 9th Ave, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10001
+1 212 226 3702 info@corporate-citizenship.com
San Francisco: 6th Floor, 220 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA, 94104 
+1 212 226 3702 info@corporate-citizenship.com
Santiago: Av. Los Militares 5953, Oficina 402, Las Condes Santiago, Chile  
+56 2 247 9008 chile@corporate-citizenship.com

Singapore: 2 Science Park Drive, The Bridge, Ascent Building #01-03 Singapore, 118222 
+65 6822 2203 
singapore@corporate-citizenship.com

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

Disclaimer
Every possible effort has been made to ensure that the information contained in this publication is accurate at the time of going to press, and the publishers and author cannot accept responsibility for any errors or omissions, however caused. No responsibility for loss or damage occasioned to any person acting, or refraining from action, as a result of the material in this publication can be accepted by the editor, the publisher or author.