It’s almost as if Democratic and Republican leaders met several weeks ago behind leather-upholstered doors to swirl brandy, puff Cohibas, and make a gentleman’s pact not to discuss climate change during their respective conventions. How else to explain the pointless shenanigans of the past week, when politicians avoided the issue as if a stray comment about emissions cuts or dwelling too long on the West’s wildfires might earn them a glove in the face and pistols at dawn? Not that it should matter, but watching Mitch McConnell count twenty paces on the field of honor would have been far better television than the Democrats’ scripted wake and Republicans’ racist, antediluvian circus. The New Republic’s Kate Aronoff has a piece out today addressing the question of why both parties have seemed hell-bent on sidelining global warming during their conventions. Democrats, with far less fossil fuel money flowing into their coffers than Republicans, may be running on an ambitious climate platform, but they mostly ignored it last week and even walked back a key promise to end fossil fuel subsidies. Republicans, as Kate points out, haven’t mentioned climate change at all: “They didn’t even call it a hoax.” (Someone check those speakers for a pulse.) Aside from some vague proclamations about American energy supremacy and jabs at expensive solar panels (inaccurate, as Kate notes), the party’s plan seems to be to avoid climate change and fossil fuels altogether. This may seem odd, but Kate argues that it makes sense if you consider corporate America’s fracturing approach to climate change: |
|
Executives in the insurance industry and on Wall Street—with its traditionally close ties to Democrats—have found the sort of outright climate denial associated with Trump to be a liability, particularly when doing business internationally. While tech magnates sell logistical support to drilling companies, companies like Apple, Microsoft, and Salesforce are eager to claim they’re helping save the planet. There’s a straightforward profit motive to looking green in 2020, a mantle easier to take up for tech monopolies than oil giants. Further widening the gap between big oil and different arms of the corporate world, the fossil fuel industry is experiencing what may well be the deepest crisis in its short history; after having been the largest company on earth in 2013, ExxonMobil on Monday was unceremoniously removed from the spot it’s held since 1928 on the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Just one oil company, Chevron, remains in the index. From Blackrock to BP, companies are trying to cash in on climate-friendly branding for what are now merely common-sense investment decisions. Two-thirds of U.S. adults, according to Pew polling, think the government is doing too little to fight climate change. Depending on which polls you look at (the coronavirus affected polling on what is and isn’t an immediate threat, for instance), a surprisingly large number of Republicans—perhaps as many as 40 percent—are in that camp. But the interests of big businesses that fund political campaigns may be more complicated. Facing these murky waters, both parties have more or less decided to avoid them—for convention week, anyway. Whatever comes next, we might all need a little backroom brandy to help us through it. —Heather Souvaine Horn, deputy editor |
|
That’s the number of times that temperatures tied or broke previous daily record highs in just four days across the western United States last week as California (and 14 other states) burned. |
|
| Over 60 percent “of the more than 1,000 European cities that have monitored their performance are on track to meeting their climate target,” according to UK-based watchdog CarbonBrief. |
|
| The AP reports that, thanks to relaxed federal regulations under the Trump administration, more than 3,000 environmental and health waivers have been granted to oil and gas companies, sewage and chemical plants, and other hazardous operations during just two months of the pandemic. |
|
The cartoon villain of the week goes to Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Stephen Hahn, who flanked President Trump during Sunday’s news conference announcing an emergency use authorization for convalescent plasma on Covid-19 patients. Hahn misrepresented a Mayo Clinic study on its efficacy and was later compelled to apologize. Everyone, of course, wants sick patients to get every chance possible, but read Melody Schreiber’s latest to understand just how thoroughly the administration’s announcement complicated vital Covid-19 research. |
|
To escape the heat, Sparkle Veronica Taylor, a 40-year-old Gilpin resident, often walks with her two young boys more than a half-hour across Richmond to a tree-lined park in a wealthier neighborhood. Her local playground lacks shade, leaving the gyms and slides to bake in the sun. The trek is grueling in summer temperatures that regularly soar past 95 degrees, but it’s worth it to find a cooler play area, she said. “The heat gets really intense, I’m just zapped of energy by the end of the day,” said Ms. Taylor, who doesn’t own a car. “But once we get to that park, I’m struck by how green the space is. I feel calmer, better able to breathe. Walking through different neighborhoods, there’s a stark difference between places that have lots of greenery and places that don’t.” Brad Plumer and Nadja Popovich | The New York Times |
|
Support Independent, Issue-Driven Journalism |
|
|
|
|