Chipotle Workers Argue Against Supreme Court Review of Wage and Hour LawsuitWashington, DC On November 2, a group of Chipotle Apprentices (entry-level managers) filed a petition with the U.S. Supreme Court asking that their wage & hour lawsuit not be reviewed. Their lawsuit, originally brought in New York as
Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., seeks overtime pay for workers who were misclassified as managers and thus not protected by wage and hour laws.
Is Dynamex Ruling Retroactive?Santa Clara, CA Just as the polls closed on Proposition 22—a ruling that allows companies to hire app-based drivers as independent contractors instead of employees—the California Supreme Court heard arguments in
Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Franchising Int’l, Inc. At issue is the
Dynamex ruling and whether it should be retroactive to worker misclassification lawsuits filed before it was decided.
Third Circuit Revives Oil Workers’ Donning and Doffing LawsuitPhiladelphia, PA On October 26, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals revived a wage & hour lawsuit originally filed by oil rig workers in 2011. At its heart,
Tyger v. Precision Drilling Corp. is a “donning and doffing” lawsuit. Rodney Tyger, Shawn Wadsworth and approximately 1,000 other rig hands seek to recover unpaid overtime, allegedly due under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). It’s not over yet; the Third Circuit remanded the lawsuit back to the District Court for further proceedings.
Hot Legal Issues
REACH LAWYERS
Advertise on Online Legal Media's weekly Class Action Newsletter to 60,000 lawyers:
POSSIBLE NEW CASES, EMERGING ISSUES
Take advantage of our experienced research team and receive free daily notification of new emerging issues and possible new cases.
LETTER TO EDITOR
Please feel free to contact our newsletter editor with your comments or suggestions.
CONTACT US
UNSUBSCRIBE If you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please click > [
UNSUBSCRIBE]
The information provided in this newsletter has been prepared by Online Legal Media, and is for general informational purposes only. The information in this newsletter may be considered advertising under various states rules governing lawyer professional conduct.
You should not act, or refrain from acting, based upon any information on this newsletter. This information does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice. The information provided in this newsletter is not privileged and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Submitting a case evaluation or any type of response or other information through this newsletter will not create an attorney-client relationship and nothing contained in this newsletter is to be considered an offer to represent you.
Information appearing in this newsletter may only be reproduced in its entirety (without modification, and must include this Notice) for the individual reader's personal or educational use. Transmission of the information appearing in this newsletter is not intended to create, and its receipt by the reader does not establish or constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
Online Legal Media 849 Almar Avenue, Suite C-197, Santa Cruz, CA, USA 95060
© 2001-2020 Online Legal Media. All Rights Reserved.