Apocalypse Soon: A weekly reckoning with life in a warming world—and the fight to save it

A weekly reckoning with life in a warming world—and the fight to save it

The downtown Los Angeles skyline is obscured by smoke.

Allen J. Schaben/Getty Images

Right now, politicians aren’t particularly scared of voters who care about climate change because those voters typically don’t list climate change as their top priority. But there are a lot of people who vote infrequently or not at all—for whom climate change and environmental issues are their number one concern.

 

That’s what Nathaniel Stinnett of the Environmental Voter Project told TNR contributor Liza Featherstone for a piece published this morning. The group thinks it’s identified the way to fix this country’s approach to environmental policy: by motivating this demographic. There’s a possibility, Liza writes, that “turning nonvoting environmentalists (and “drop off” voters, those who have voted in presidential years but not otherwise) into voters could swing elections.”


Who knows whether this will pan out? But gosh, it’s not like America’s current climate politics could get much worse. While editing Liza’s piece for publication, I couldn’t help but think of another news item from this week: On Monday, Reuters reported that the White House may waive summertime rules that reduce smog, in yet another flailing bid to lower gas prices.

{{#if }}
 

Support Our Journalists

Our writers and editors are bringing you vital reporting, explanation, and analysis to understand the current climate crisis—but they need your help.

Here’s a special offer to subscribe to The New Republic.

—Heather Souvaine Horn, deputy editor

Try The New Republic for just $10
 
{{/if}}

This is the kind of news item that makes you wonder whether the U.S. political system is irretrievably broken. The Biden administration, clearly, is desperate. They’ve seen the midterm projections. They know full well that inflation pisses people off. They’ve got precious little to show for their big legislative push. While there’s almost no chance they’re going to curb the price of anything before voters make up their minds about the November elections, they’d like to be seen as trying something, anything, in the hope that it slightly reduces Democratic losses.

 

The White House has already done some very foolish things in pursuit of the appearance of productivity, as Kate Aronoff wrote earlier this month. Fining oil companies for not drilling more, for example, wouldn’t just damage the climate; it’s also extremely unlikely to lower gas prices. The process by which gas prices are set, Kate explained, occurs in a mind-bending world of unregulated commodity trading. It’s nothing like the tidy X graph of supply and demand lines you recall from Econ 101.

 

Ditching summer smog rules, the White House’s thinking goes, would help lower gas prices by reducing costs for refiners and blenders: Currently, they have to omit certain lower-cost, smog-causing ingredients in summer. Waive that requirement, and gasoline could be produced at a cheaper rate. The White House is considering waiving it for all grades of gasoline, according to Reuters.

 

This is a particularly boneheaded move coming the year after many regions experienced their worst summer air quality in years, both from wildfire smoke and ozone. One report from a Swiss air quality tech company estimated that U.S. air pollution in 2021 was two to three times the limits recommended in World Health Organization guidelines. There’s every indication that this summer will also be very bad—not just because wildfires have started absurdly early this year and the Western drought is worsening but also because the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has forecast above-normal temperatures for almost the entire United States for the 2022 summer. Heat both intensifies wildfire risk and increases ground-level ozone, creating smog.

 

Air quality is not hypothetical stuff. It’s hurting people now. The American Lung Association’s 2022 “State of the Air” report found that over 40 percent of Americans “are living in places with failing grades for unhealthy levels of particle pollution or ozone.” The crisis is accelerating. “In the three years covered by this report,” the authors wrote, “Americans experienced more days of ‘very unhealthy’ and ‘hazardous’ air quality than ever before in the two-decade history of ‘State of the Air.’” People of color are way more likely to live in places where their air is being poisoned by particle pollution and ozone, which in turn is known to cause or exacerbate a dizzying array of health problems: asthma, premature birth, lung cancer, and a weakened immune system. Air pollution is linked to higher Covid-19 death rates, as well.

 

Yes, high gas prices are hurting people. But the only real solution to that problem, as Kate has pointed out, is to get off gasoline—which would have the salutary effect of keeping the planet livable. When Democratic politicians are considering sacrificing air quality during a respiratory disease pandemic just to look like they’re doing something about gas prices, something is deeply wrong in the party’s politics.

 

Heather Souvaine Horn, deputy editor

 

Advertising

 

Good News

The Massachusetts Supreme Court has rejected ExxonMobil’s motion to dismiss a case brought by the state’s attorney general that alleges the company concealed evidence its products were driving climate change. This should be an interesting one to watch.

Bad News

As the drought in the West accelerates, California water regulators continue claiming that oil field wastewater can safely be used to water crops—a questionable assertion, as Liza Gross reports for Inside Climate News.

 

Stat of the Week

14–21 

That’s the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s prediction for the number of named storms in the 2022 Atlantic hurricane season, which apparently has a 65 percent chance of being “above normal.”

 

Elsewhere in the Ecosystem

In her resignation letter Monday, Shell operational safety consultant Caroline Dennett decried the company’s plans to explore new drilling opportunities despite the worsening climate crisis. Vox’s Rebecca Leber spoke with Dennett, who said this about her decision to quit:

It’s a bit like if someone asks you to go and work in the tobacco industry. I’ve continued for as long as I have because of the firm belief that whilst they are operating, people need to be safe. We need to prevent as many leaks as we can. We need to prevent as many major incidents as we can. But there comes a time where it’s just time to divorce. I’ve come to the point where I can’t live with my own conscience for continuing to support a company that just so blatantly doesn’t care about what’s happening with the climate and the people that it will harm.

 

But the work I’ve done in Shell has been valuable in terms of preventing harm to individuals and preventing oil and gas leaks. I suppose I’ve comforted myself that it’s a trade-off. By doing this, I’m helping it stay as safe as it can be, whilst it’s running, but with the hope that it was going to transition and we’d be moving toward more renewables and winding down in terms of new exploration. More recently, it’s come to my attention they are still constructing new oil and gas developments and still looking for new reserves. We can’t do this anymore.

 

What Subscribers Are Reading

Companies that run the electrical grid have long been accused of anti-competitive and abusive practices. Now a massive coalition of 235 organizations is pressuring the Federal Trade Commission to investigate them.

by Kate Aronoff

 

Global warming is introducing unprecedented risk into the financial system. The Fed has the power to limit that risk. Instead, Jerome Powell is sitting on his hands.

by Aaron Regunberg

 
The New Republic
Introductory offer: 50% off fearless reporting. 1 year for $10.
Donate
facebook
 
instagram
 
twitter
 

Update your personal preferences for newsletter@newslettercollector.com by clicking here

Copyright © 2022 The New Republic, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:

The New Republic 1 Union Sq W Fl 6 New York, NY 10003-3303 USA


Do you want to stop receiving all emails from TNR? Unsubscribe from this list. If you stopped getting TNR emails, update your profile to resume receiving them.