The Wall Street Journal, citing data from a July blog post from crypto analytics firm Elliptic, said Hamas raised over $90 million in crypto. This (obviously) caused great consternation from within the crypto community, which doesn't particularly want to be associated with a terrorist organization in the wake of a major attack.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and around 100 other lawmakers wrote a letter to the U.S. Treasury Department and National Security Advisor asking about crypto's role in terrorism.
Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), chair of the Senate Banking Committee, said the crypto link must be looked at (citing the same letter).
Chainalysis, another analytics firm, pushed back on the WSJ reporting on the Elliptic blog post.
The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that would designate all mixers (tools to obfuscate the origin and destination for funds) as a "primary money laundering concern," though it also alarmed other parts of the crypto industry who said the proposed rule would capture all of decentralized finance (DeFi). Worth noting that while the timing of the publication of this proposal seems somewhat coincidental to the Hamas attack in early October, it was probably percolating internally for a while – this kind of thing does not happen overnight.
In a turn of events, Elliptic published another blog post saying its data had been misinterpreted.
Journal reporter Ian Talley tweeted out a side-by-side comparison of Elliptic's most recent blog post and what the company said in July.
Looking at the original Elliptic post, while it does provide a disclosure up top that some of the addresses are frozen by Israel's national counter-terrorism entity, it also say throughout the post that the "wallets [are] linked to Palestinian Islamic Jihad by" Israel's National Bureau for Counter Terror Financing of Israel, which is vague enough that I think I understand where the Journal is coming from.
Elsewhere, bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) hype was up, except wait no it wasn't, except yes it was, except no, except wait maybe X (formerly Twitter) just isn't a great source of information?
After three false starts, including a speaker-designate who was speaker-designate just long enough to see all four House members who were supposed to be on my panel cancel (if any of your staffers are reading, hi!), the House of Representatives has a leader again. No one looks happier than former Speaker Pro Tempore Patrick McHenry, who can now return to running the House Financial Services Committee.
In Sam Bankman-Fried news, we do seem to be nearing the end of this trial. The Department of Justice is about ready to rest its case, and the defense only has a few witnesses to call (though that list does include Bankman-Fried himself).