To investors, I was recently listening to a conversation between Joe Rogan and General H.R. McMaster, a retired United States Army lieutenant general who served as the 26th United States National Security Advisor from 2017 to 2018. The discussion was quite wide-ranging, but a specific comment from General McMaster caught my attention. About 30 minutes into the conversation, the General was speaking about the United States and China. He described the difference between confrontation and competition. This excerpt highlights his main point:
This idea of competition, rather than confrontation, is a nuanced concept that is important to understand. The United States and China are the two superpowers of the world. They have competing ideologies and political systems. The two countries are optimizing for the same end result, but they are choosing to take very different paths. Violent conflict was the default way of dealing with countries that are at odds with each other historically. That solution appears antiquated in today’s environment. Modern weapons have evolved to the point where they are almost too lethal. Either country could wipe out entire cities and wide swaths of the other country’s population with lightning fast speed. The collateral damage is unknowable, and frankly, the battlefield has shifted from atoms to bits. Cyber warfare is a bigger focus for both countries, compared to military operations that would require invasions, the dropping of bombs, and potential loss of human life. Regardless of the military tactics that are pursued, there is no denying that the United States and China are in a global competition. They are competing for resources, technology, talent, and ultimately, economic prosperity. The United States’ pursuit of efficiency over resilience was well documented by the COVID-19 pandemic. We were exposed to have little domestic manufacturing capabilities and a heavy reliance on international partners for the production and distribution of various goods. This realization has rekindled a concentrated effort to on-shore manufacturing and supply chains, while treating these important functions as national security issues. As we look forward to other areas of competition, it is hard not to identify the intersection of money and technology as an important area of focus. The Chinese Communist Party has created, and is testing, a central bank digital currency that gives them immense control over their citizens. This new currency carries the exact same monetary policy as the existing renminbi, but the technology upgrade empowers the centralized government to more easily confiscate wealth, censor transactions, punish citizens, and exert complete financial control over all users. You could argue that this won’t be a problem for the global population if China is merely going to hand this technology to their own citizens, but that is not their plan. Just as China has scoured the world for opportunities to lend capital and exert more influence or control, they are looking for opportunities to increase adoption of the digital renminbi by citizens outside of China. As I have written about before, this pursuit of the Chinese digital currency is all about accessibility. If you’re a citizen in Venezuela, Zimbabwe, or other faltering countries, you are frantically seeking for an asset that you can convert your fiat currency into. Your domestic currency is failing. Historically, gold and other analog assets were options, but there are too many horror stories of confiscation at borders, etc. The first option for many of these people is to seek US dollars. There is safety and stability that comes with holding the world’s reserve currency. The issue is that it may be dangerous to purchase physical dollars on the black market, your bank is likely to collude with your government to confiscate money in your account, and it can be incredibly expensive to purchase dollars due to unofficial currency conversion rates. The ideal scenario is that you can use an internet connection to access a new currency. If you don’t have access to a digital dollar, but you have access to a digital renminbi, there is a high likelihood that you will simply pick the best of what is available. Now many people will say “No! They will convert their assets to bitcoin!” Maybe this is true, but the reality is that the volatility of the asset, and the newness of a decentralized currency, still scares a good amount of people in these countries. Regardless of the popularity of bitcoin, the United States can’t sit on the sidelines in these scenarios. The global competition for digital currency adoption is already underway. China, the most important competition that we have today, has already created and distributed their digital currency. They are going to push the pace of adoption outside their borders, which is essentially a move to gain market share. The United States must act with speed and conviction. We must decide whether our central bank and the US Treasury are capable of creating their own digital dollar in a timely manner, or we must go with the technical solution that has already received market adoption from one of the private US dollar stablecoin enterprises. Additionally, just as General McMaster’s pointed out, the United States should heavily consider advocating for, and facilitating, the use of technologies that give the average citizen more sovereignty. China wants servitude. America was built on sovereignty. If America was to continue to pursue our ethos, there is a national security argument to be made for the United States to work aggressively to see bitcoin succeed on a global stage. This may seem counterintuitive to most people, but the United States of America should pursue a dual strategy — drive global adoption of digital dollars and bitcoin. Bitcoin prevents the centralized, authoritarian governments of the world from sinking their fingers into every corner of an individual’s financial life. It makes it impossible for a dictatorship to censor citizens or coerce them via financial controls. The digital dollar extends the US dollar dominance and increases the likelihood that the world’s reserve currency is the number one choice whenever someone wants to make a transaction. Bitcoin is defense. The US dollar is offense. These two assets, working in tandem, can help the United States become the dominant player on a global stage, while simultaneously wrecking havoc on our largest competitor. We have to recognize that we are in competition. Conflict is not the intended goal. The United States can win in the free market. We have the intellectual horsepower, the technical capabilities, and now we must ensure we have the political will to compete. If we are willing to play the game, I like our chances of winning. Hope each of you has a great day. I’ll talk to you tomorrow. -Pomp SPONSORED: Mode allows you to buy, earn and grow Bitcoin, all in one app. Not only is it a secure app to buy & hold Bitcoin, Mode allows you to pay & receive up to 10% Bitcoin Cashback from its growing list of online partner brands. Mode, the UK fintech app is one of a kind. They’re FCA registered and are listed on the LSE in the UK and OTCQB in the US Mode is giving away ONE WHOLE Bitcoin to one of their customers. All you have to do is set up an account with Mode to be in with a chance of winning - that’s it! The opportunity ends January 31, 2022.Download Mode on the App Store and Google Play. Only available in the UK. LISTEN TO THIS EPISODE OF THE POMP PODCAST HERE Kevin O'Leary is a world-class entrepreneur and investor, and is also the host of the popular ABC show "Shark Tank". In this conversation, we discuss Kevin's growing crypto portfolio, regulation necessary for the Crypto space, Institutional Capital, and where he see's the industry going in 2022. LISTEN TO THIS EPISODE OF THE POMP PODCAST HERE Podcast SponsorsThese companies make the podcast possible, so go check them out and thank them for their support!
You are receiving The Pomp Letter because you either signed up or you attended one of the events that I spoke at. Feel free to unsubscribe if you aren’t finding this valuable. Nothing in this email is intended to serve as financial advice. Do your own research. You’re a free subscriber to The Pomp Letter. For the full experience, become a paid subscriber. |