U.N. Security Council reform, the nature of party primaries in America, and misconceptions about the crypto landscape.
March 8, 2022 Editor’s note: Join us at 9:00 AM EST for a Twitter Spaces conversation with Tanvi Madan, Mireya Solis, Andrew Yeo, Patricia Kim, and Ryan Hass about how Asian countries are reacting to the crisis in Ukraine. Set a reminder here. | Shifting crypto landscape threatens crime investigations and sanctions A persistent misconception has taken root among policymakers: That cryptocurrencies pose a major threat to sanctions regimes and anti-money laundering efforts because of the anonymity they provide users. This perception belies an inaccurate understanding of how the technology works and can lead to failure in addressing the complex dynamics between cybercriminals, sanctioned entities, and law enforcement agencies, write Richard Clark, Sarah Kreps, and Adi Rao. Read more | Why primaries are the most important races in America “For many years [party primaries] have been the ugly stepchild of American politics; ignored by journalists and snubbed by political scientists. All that is changing.” Following the first primary elections of the year, Elaine Kamarck provides analysis of the results in Texas and explains the shifting nature of primaries in the United States. Read more | Will Ukraine’s tragedy spur UN Security Council reform? With peace increasingly at risk, the U.N. Security Council could play a much greater role in mitigating dangerous world events like Russia’s war in Ukraine. Kemal Derviş and José Antonio Ocampo discuss the council’s shortcomings and share a proposal that would radically change how the body operates. Read more | Help support Brookings with a donation Brookings is committed to making its high-quality, independent policy research free to the public. Please consider making a contribution today to our Annual Fund to support our experts' work. | The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publication are solely those of its author(s), and do not reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its other scholars. | |