Many medical staffs fail to screen for conflicts of interest in their decision-making processes, despite the need to ensure clinical decisions are made for the betterment of patient care, rather than for fame, glory, or the bottom line. Joint Commission standard LD.04.02.01 states that conflicts of interest involving leaders must be disclosed according to the hospital’s defined method.

Published 5/30/18

CMS has cited University of Maryland Medical Center in Baltimore for violating the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) stemming from an incident in which a female patient wearing only a gown and socks was escorted from the hospital by security staff and left at a bus stop on a cold January night. She was eventually brought back to the hospital by ambulance and then sent to a homeless shelter by cab.

Published 5/29/18

In a 4-3 decision, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (the “Court”) recently affirmed a Superior Court decision to uphold a trial court’s ruling that limited the scope of the state’s Peer Review Protection Act (PRPA). The Court ruled that peer review documents are only protected by the PRPA if they are generated by professional healthcare providers.

Does your hospital require a drug screen for physicians on the medical staff at initial appointment? Answer our new poll question to let us know. You must be signed in with your free or paid CRC account to participate.

This question was first posed on the Credentialing Resource Center Forums. Have something else on your mind? Click here to get the conversation started.