Popular protests against a planned lithium mine in Serbia, and allegations of government repression, are raising questions about the EU’s ability to secure critical raw materials for the green transition while also preserving its human rights commitment.
This summer the European Commission found itself on the frontlines of a domestic battle between Serbian protestors and global mining giant Rio Tinto, which wants to develop a large lithium mine in the Jadar Valley, near Serbia’s western border with Bosnia.
As part of its decarbonisation drive the European Commission signed on 19 July a ‘Strategic Partnership’ with Serbia on critical raw materials, batteries and electric vehicles.
Some Serbian civil society representatives are wary of the EU’s involvement.
"The state of the rule of law and the weaknesses of the environmental protection system definitively prevent Serbia from being part of the sustainable supply chain of critical raw materials for the EU," said Serbian NGO RERI told Euractiv after a European Parliament debate in Brussels on Wednesday 2 October.
Rio Tinto’s proposed mine could open at the end of 2028 and aims to produce 58,000 tonnes of lithium a year, enough to equip 1.1 million electric cars with batteries.
Several Serbian civil society organisations, invited to last week’s European Parliament debate, allege that the Serbian government was repressing the protest activities.
"According to data provided by the Ministry of the Interior, 38 people were arrested and 17 were charged in this latest round of demonstrations", said Uroš Jovanović of the civil society organisation Građanske.
According to Iva Marković from NGO Polekol, even after the protests ended people were still being detained on a daily basis, while scientists are receiving death threats and being asked to withdraw their studies on the environmental impact of this mining project.
“The lithium mining projects have been presented as an opportunity to boost economic growth solely” said Jovanović who explained that since activists started questioning the project, they were labelled as “opposing national interests, enemies of the state.”
The Serbian government did not reply to a Euractiv request for comment.
However, in widely-reported comments in August, Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic said that the protestors were part of a “western-backed hybrid warfare” against his government.
Nathan Canas and Bárbara Machado explore why Europe has found itself embroiled in Serbian domestic politics and get the European Commission’s take on the issue.