Italy-Albania migration deal highlights flaws of EU migration pact EU leaders are fond of pontificating about the importance of combining the so-called ‘internal dimension’ of migration (the policies for migration management within the EU) together with the ‘external’ one, such as EU-third country deals covering migration control. The controversial deals with third countries, however, will not bring the desired result of stopping arrivals, since for any closed route, another human trafficking business will be developed on another new one, with the immediate result of many people suffering abuses from the smuggling network. The external dimension of migration exists primarily because leaders know that the EU migration pact (the ten legislative files EU institutions are negotiating), even if adopted, will not make migration much more manageable. Because there is no interest in normalising the movement of certain categories of people within the Schengen area. EU Commissioners such as Ylva Johansson and Margaritis Schinas have said several times that migration has to be solved at its roots. But the root problem of migration is not found in the countries of origin, but in the concept that those ‘migrants’ should not be coming to Europe in the first place and are, therefore, a problem. Agreements with third countries are the collateral effect of the EU’s inability to agree on an EU framework of migration management that would be sustainable on the ground and at the borders. Giorgia Meloni’s new cooperation pact with Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama to effectively outsource migration and asylum processing underscores the lack of confidence that the migration pact will solve the situation. Even though it would facilitate some harmonisation of procedures, the pact follows the prevailing political will of EU states to keep people from reaching the bloc. The Meloni-Rama agreement is more complicated than the others because Albania is an EU candidate country. It is not even clear whether such a deal complies with international law. But it is clear that compliance with international law on migration is an optional extra for the EU27 and the EU, so long as everybody is happy. |