The little-noticed vote to change the EU treaties The hard business of lawmaking was the dominant theme in Strasbourg this week. Packaging, pesticides, transport emissions, right to repair and many others occupied the time and minds of MEPs and officials. These are the most intense months for EU legislators and the many interest groups lobbying around them: lawmakers only have a few months to get laws onto the statute book before the end of the mandate. Meanwhile, with the June elections fast approaching, many national and European parties are already in campaign mode. Amid this tumult of law and politics, the decision by MEPs to back a demand for treaty reform and a formal call for a convention to discuss reform has been dismissed by many as a ‘niche’ topic. That would be a mistake: this was a historic vote, as there is a tiny window of opportunity to open the convention. But there is hardly a groundswell of momentum behind it. Including abstentions, the Parliament’s demands were backed by fewer than half the MEPs – 305 votes to 276 against. That was partly because of the length and ambition of the shopping list of reforms demanded by MEPs. In particular, the centre-right European People’s Party was divided in the final vote because of a proposal seeking to limit the number of Commissioners composing the EU executive. Those divisions in Parliament could give national governments an added excuse to shoot down the treaty reform plans. As it is, heads of states now have to decide, probably in a vote in December with a simple majority, on whether to open a convention or not. The issue is, at the time of writing, not on the agenda of December’s European Council summit – though this could change. The question of reforming the EU treaties is heavily polarised in some member states. Poland is flatly against it. However, to trigger the convention, 14 member states have to be in favour – still a hard task, but more manageable in comparison with the famous ‘unanimity’. In the meantime, there is another factor that could convince member states to use the convention: the enlargement process. If new members are to join the EU, their accession treaties will, by definition, make some reforms to the bloc as a whole. So the question is, why not start getting on with the convention at the beginning of the next mandate? |