Government Preemption Doesn’t Apply to 3M EarplugsFlorida In a Florida federal court last week, a group of military plaintiffs said that 3M can't argue that a government contract preemption gives it clearance to exit its 3M earplug lawsuit, which alleges the Combat Arms Earplug v2 made for the military is defective, because the earplugs were also advertised for civilian use.
Papa John’s to Settle California Wage Theft Lawsuit for $3.4 MillionSanta Ana, CA Papa John’s International has asked the Central District of California to approve a $3.4 million settlement to end a lawsuit that claimed the pizza chain failed to pay workers for required training time. The conduct described violates the Fair Labor Standards Act as well as wage requirements of New York and California labor law.
BOEING DEFENDANTS IN STOCK DROP LAWSUIT CLAIM THEY WERE NOT FIDUCIARIESChicago, IL On March 2 attorneys for Boeing, its 401k retirement plan and the plan’s investment committee asked the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois to dismiss
Burke v. The Boeing Co. The defendants claim that Newport Trust Co., the plan’s investment manager, was solely responsible for any losses incurred by participants in the Boeing Voluntary Investment Plan (VIP) when the value of Boeing’s stock dropped in the aftermath of the 737 MAX 8 aircraft disasters. Newport was not named as a defendant in the ERISA lawsuit.
Hot Legal Issues
REACH LAWYERS
Advertise on Online Legal Media's weekly Class Action Newsletter to 60,000 lawyers:
POSSIBLE NEW CASES, EMERGING ISSUES
Take advantage of our experienced research team and receive free daily notification of new emerging issues and possible new cases.
LETTER TO EDITOR
Please feel free to contact our newsletter editor with your comments or suggestions.
CONTACT US
UNSUBSCRIBE If you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please click > [
UNSUBSCRIBE]
The information provided in this newsletter has been prepared by Online Legal Media, and is for general informational purposes only. The information in this newsletter may be considered advertising under various states rules governing lawyer professional conduct.
You should not act, or refrain from acting, based upon any information on this newsletter. This information does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice. The information provided in this newsletter is not privileged and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Submitting a case evaluation or any type of response or other information through this newsletter will not create an attorney-client relationship and nothing contained in this newsletter is to be considered an offer to represent you.
Information appearing in this newsletter may only be reproduced in its entirety (without modification, and must include this Notice) for the individual reader's personal or educational use. Transmission of the information appearing in this newsletter is not intended to create, and its receipt by the reader does not establish or constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
Online Legal Media 849 Almar Avenue, Suite C-197, Santa Cruz, CA, USA 95060
© 2001-2020 Online Legal Media. All Rights Reserved.