Plus, nominate a colleague for the CRC Achievement Awards!
|
|
Weekly Roundup | Featured content: Exploring HIPAA myths | Has your organization baked HIPAA myths into its compliance program? If you’ve fallen for one of the common HIPAA myths below, your program needs another look. |
Free resource: Malpractice analysis form | The malpractice analysis form should be given out with your medical staff application. This form is used to help MSPs and physician leaders determine if claims are outside the norm and require further investigation. The questions/numbers on this form are just suggestions; you should adjust them to fit the specific needs of your organization. Just because an applicant might have a high settlement or numerous settlements, that does not mean you should automatically deny his or her application, but further review the specifics of the situation. |
Quick tip: Ensure clear documentation of patient handoff and discharge | Hospitals must continue to meet the Conditions of Participation outlined in Interpretive Guidelines in Appendix A of the CMS' State Operations Manual (SOM), notes Frank Ruelas, a patient safety professional and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) consultant who founded HIPAA College in Arizona. |
| |
New Content: Members Only | Addressing internal and external conflicts of interest | Published 9/13/18 Clashing interests and ethics can undermine the integrity of medical staff tasks, create financial disputes between a healthcare institution and the physicians who practice there, disrupt key governance processes, cause rifts that jeopardize patient care, and even result in costly legal action. |
Managing peer review bias | Published 9/12/18 One of the key challenges in any evaluation of human performance is the issue of bias, and peer review is no different. If a critical goal of peer review is fairness, then we must avoid any actions—intended or unintended—that would bias the results. What is bias? It is a tendency or preference toward a particular perspective or result. It may be either a conscious or an unconscious prejudice that is introduced into a process. It may be due to individual preferences or a systematic error introduced into sampling or testing that encourages one outcome over another. Intended or not, bias undermines the reliability or accuracy of the result. |
Amending medical staff bylaws | Published 9/10/18 Bylaws should be carefully written to ensure that they can’t be changed casually, but also that amendments don’t face an unreasonable hurdle. This balancing act will be decided differently by various medical staffs. However the medical staff authorizes amendments to its bylaws, changes must be ultimately approved by the hospital governing body. This is a requirement established under the Medicare Conditions of Participation (CoP), which state that the bylaws must “be approved by the governing body.” |
| |
CRC Announcements | Don't forget to take the 2018 MSP Salary Survey! | The Credentialing Resource Center’s (CRC) annual MSP Salary Survey measures the compensation rates, essential duties, and other workplace trends shaping the careers of MSPs across the industry. Click here to take the survey and make sure your experiences are represented! |
| |
| Contact Us | Karen Kondilis Managing Editor Credentialing Resource Center kkondilis@hcpro.com HCPro 35 Village Road, Suite 200 Middleton, MA 01949 800-650-6787 www.hcpro.com For advertising and marketing opportunities with the Credentialing Resource Center, please email dhartley@hcpro.com. | |
Career Center | Post your open positions or find your next career move with the HCPro Career Center. | |
|
|
|