Football Daily hacks are accustomed to having a gun put to their heads and being forced to write drivel about the latest issues in football, so we know it is not an enjoyable experience but we still manage to take joy in the pain copywriters must be in when winding their prose about new football kits.
“This marked the start of a new era for the club, defined by new records, new legends, and moments of greatness,” someone at Puma blurted about Manchester City’s overpriced blue nylon. “The 2023-24 home kit is a testament to this legacy, celebrating the Etihad Stadium and all those who call it home.” Then they have the gall to explain it is based on a 20-year-old kit, which you bought for a more reasonable price when you were actually young and could fit into an L.
City faced some stiff competition for nonsense from Anfield, with their new garment (still red, like last year). Needless to say, it has an obligatory “nod to the past” as it looks similar to the shirt they had in the 70s, because it is red. There’s not that much you can do with it when having to come up with a new money-spinner every 12 months. Thankfully, a video was made to show what red looks like. “The players are relaxed and playful, portraying the soulful ‘70s feel with the sound provided by local musician Pixey with her ‘70s-inspired track, Just Move,” parped the press release. Good not to get too angsty when convincing people to part with £75 for a new shirt.
Brentford, meanwhile, have stuck with red and white stripes that blend“tradition with a bold modern style”, but with a shocking twist: “There is a stronger presence of black in this year’s jersey, creating a bold Brentford look.” That sentence means nothing. We like to think they have learned from the best on that front. Thankfully, the Bees will be keeping this ensemble for two seasons, so we will be spared Umbro’s word vomit next summer. Elsewhere in west London, Fulham are all about football heritage: “Whilst resolutely forward-looking as a club since 1879, heritage is still proudly recognised within the shirt’s design.” Those mismatched Adidas stripes were proudly worn in the 1883-84 season, we remember it well.
Then there’s Aston Villa, who are putting fans into the fabric of each kit before charging them a hefty fee to own one. Their new kit “depicts a subtle print of soundwaves taken from fans singing on a matchday” – and then plasters the name of a betting firm over it, leaving said fans a bit miffed. At the height of summer, we are of course grateful for this nonsense, but we’ve read enough traditional-yet-modern PR guff for one year. Perhaps Football Daily should give it a try, serving up vintage Hugh McIlvanney blended with FaceTok slang. On second thoughts, perhaps not.