This week, the United Kingdom marked the 80th anniversary of Victory in Europe Day with a series of poignant and celebratory events.
The Royal Family—including King Charles III, Prince William, and Princess Kate—attended a service of Thanksgiving at Westminster Abbey, observing two minutes of silence in remembrance.
The commemorations culminated in a classic royal concert at Horse Guards Parade, celebrating the resilience and unity of the nation with plenty of Union Jack imagery.
Notably absent from these events was Prince Harry despite being one of the very few living royals to have seen active military service (in Afghanistan).
While it’s valid to argue that Harry has behaved unwisely in litigating his grievances with the royal family in public, youthful idiocy in princes is usually forgiven.
Indeed, a YouGov poll this week indicated that Harry still maintains a 56 percent favorability rating in the United States.
Kings are expected to be wiser, and the failure to get Harry back inside the royal tent reflects exceptionally poorly on Charles.
Harry‘s ongoing absence as the king fights cancer—which Harry did his best last week to remind us is probably going to kill him in the not-too-distant future without actually saying it—represents a painful indictment of King Charles’s authority, not to mention his oft-vaunted alleged convening power.
Sources close to the king and Prince William have repeatedly told The Daily Beast that the principal block to reconciliation is William.
Why is William able to thwart the king? Again, it’s all connected to Charles’ decision to announce he had cancer. William‘s team has argued that Charles cannot bequeath his heir a settlement with Harry that William cannot live with.
With the cat out of the bag, Charles increasingly looks like a lame duck monarch to many.