As outcomes-based funding models have become increasingly prevalent, all but a handful of states have implemented some type of equity metric, according to an analysis by HCM Strategists. These measures support the success of specific populations, such as minority, low-income, and adult students and military veterans. Establishing clear equity metrics helps eliminate the possibility of unintended consequences when designing formulas.

In The Chronicle's issue brief,  "The Rise of Performance-Based Funding," you'll learn about the current national landscape of this funding model. Explore success stories, expert advice, and data to help you navigate the intricacies of performance-based funding, which was created as an incentive for institutions to improve student success.

Order your copy and gain insight into:

• The motivations of lawmakers and others seeking greater accountability
• The types of institutional benchmarks used to demonstrate student success
• How to assess the effectiveness of different funding models
• How to avoid unintended negative consequences as you adapt
• Ways to work with your state and create fairer metrics
  

The Chronicle | 1255 Twenty-Third St., N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20037
Privacy Policy | Unsubscribe or update your email preferences here