Plus, expert research and commentary on the state of policing reform in America.
Is Congress about to hand China the AI future? Perhaps sensing that its window of opportunity is closing before Donald Trump takes office, Congress is quietly advancing AI proposals during the lame-duck session that could have far-reaching implications. Rushing to legislate is ill-advised, argues Sarah Kreps. Even if the Trump administration scraps Joe Biden’s executive order on AI, existing legal statutes already address many immediate concerns, and the potential for overregulation threatens both U.S. economic innovation and national security leadership—particularly in the context of global competition with China, Kreps warns. |
Policing in America The state of reform. To provide greater insights on policing, Rashawn Ray and Robyn Moore share the new State-level Policing Legislation Database, which features demographic data, the number of citizens killed by police, and information on state legislative politics. How police violence reshapes community health and trust. “Achieving equity in community health and public safety is arduous and requires committed members from the community and public safety agencies to build the social ties and social institutions that can promote humanity, dignity, and a sense of well-being,” argue Rashawn Ray, Keon L. Gilbert, and co-authors. How Baltimore and St. Louis are addressing challenges. Earlier this week, the Race, Prosperity, and Inclusion Initiative at Brookings held a discussion on reform happening at the local level and the impact of policy changes. |
About Brookings The Brookings Institution is a nonprofit organization based in Washington, D.C. Our mission is to conduct in-depth, nonpartisan research to improve policy and governance at local, national, and global levels. If you were forwarded this email, sign up for the Brookings Brief to stay updated on our latest work. |
The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publication are solely those of its author(s), and do not reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its other scholars. |
|
