Friday, 8 October 2021 — Baltimore, Maryland | By Bill Bonner | Editor, The Rum Rebellion |
|
[6 min read] No geniusRigged gameWho’s the loser?The press is reporting this morning that the foot is finally making contact with the can. Here’s Bloomberg: ‘Senate Closes in on Deal to Pull US Back from Brink of Default’. Is that great news or what? The spending, borrowing, printing, bribing, squandering, corrupting, twisting, distorting, cheating, fouling, and destroying can go on. Hallelujah. And this week, we’ve been looking at the effect this program has on investors — university endowments, for example. The US’s leading colleges are probably the least curious institutions in the country. They are convinced that they have the truth — diversity, anti-racism, climate control, equality, and ESG (environmental, social, and corporate governance) investing. No need to look any further. And so, when their own endowments earn preposterous returns, no one asks any questions. Or, if…in a fit of admiration…Duke alumni dare to wonder: ‘Uh…how did you make 10 times more than GDP growth?’…they get the anodyne answers: ‘Super-smart managers…and alternative investments.’ Not quite. No genius Duke was an outlier in 2021, with a 56% return…while the economy is growing at about 5%. On average, university endowments didn’t earn 10 times more than GDP growth…only about half that much. And not with ‘alternative’ investments or genius managers. Here’s the lowdown from Inside Higher ED: ‘College and university endowments posted their strongest annual performance in 35 years, according to new data from Wilshire Trust Universe Comparison Service reported by Bloomberg. ‘The median return before fees was 27 percent in the 2021 fiscal year, which ended on June 30. By comparison, U.S. college and university endowments saw a 2.6 percent median return in fiscal year 2020 and a 6 percent median return in fiscal year 2019. College endowments of at least $500 million — of which there are about 200 — reported a median return of 34 percent in fiscal 2021, higher than the overall average.’ There’s no reason to think college endowments will be any better than anyone else at choosing the year’s hot sector or hot stock. And they are so large, they are very unlikely to outperform…as a group. The Nasdaq rose from 9,875 at the end of June 2020 to 14,500 at the end of June 2021 (a fiscal year for the endowments). That’s a 47% increase, considerably more than the median endowment fund return of 27%. The Dow, meanwhile, went from 25,600 to 34,300. That’s a 34% increase. And the S&P 500 went from 3,050 to 4,300 — a 40% increase. In other words, with a median gain of 27%, the endowment managers underperformed. No ‘alternatives’ or geniuses were needed. Rigged game But wait… This is where it gets interesting. How could the entire capital market grow so much faster than the economy that supports it? In a healthy economy, one company may do better…another may do worse. But one’s sales are another’s profits. One’s costs are another’s revenues. One month may be strong. Another may be weak. Profits may accumulate in a boom year…but dissipate in the next bust. Overall, they can’t do much better than the economy itself — because they are the economy. Let’s say we have a banana stand. And let’s say we make a profit of US$1,000 a year. We could sell our banana stand to someone for…say…US$10,000. The buyer would be getting it at a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 10. Very reasonable. And he could expect to get a 10% annual return on his investment. The next year, he might see his returns go up to US$1,050 — a 5% increase. Then, he could expect to sell the enterprise to someone else for, maybe, US$10,500 — a 5% increase. Not a 30% increase. So, if these endowment funds were investing in the US’s capital structure…in the banana stands that produce goods and provide services…they should expect growth equal to GDP…and no more. And yet, last year, they and other investors did at least five times better. The question won’t be raised at meetings of university endowment boards…nor in the US Treasury Department…nor at the Federal Reserve…nor in the financial press. So we’ll raise it here: How come? And here we propose an answer: They are not really ‘investing’ at all. They are just gambling…‘taking’ not ‘making’ in a zero-sum game…and counting on the Fed to rig it for them. Who’s the loser? But this hypothesis only introduces more puzzlement. If they are winning so much…who is losing? Who’s on the other side of the trade? Obviously, they can’t be taking their winnings from each other, because we’re talking about the median return for the whole group. And the economy itself didn’t produce the extra wealth; it grew only by about 5%, while the funds added 27%. So, who’s the pigeon? And wait a cotton-pickin’ minute. Aren’t these the same universities that are committed to ESG — environmental, social, and corporate governance — and are willing to sacrifice some investment returns in order to promote their political agenda? And now, they’re gaining wealth five times faster than the common working man’s wage increases. Oh dear, dear reader…have you jumped ahead of us again? Is it possible that they are taking the money from the downtrodden masses, making fools of the very people they pretend to care so much about? Let’s look at it on Monday and try to figure out what is going on. Regards, Bill Bonner, For The Rum Rebellion | By Cory Bernardi | Editor, Cory Bernardi Confidential |
|
The dirty secrets of Big Pharma continue to be exposed. After an expose of Johnson & Johnson by the media group Veritas, they have now released footage of Pfizer scientists talking about the cash cow known as COVID. Advertisement: Our first equity play into the crypto world… There’s an arms race going on with bitcoin miners right now. Chinese miners have been pushed out due to Beijing’s crackdown. And a new bunch of players are coming in to fill the gap. Pick the right ones now…and you could be sitting on some of the most successful stocks of 2022. Ryan Dinse and Greg Canavan have just picked three. Their first equity forays into the crypto space. To find out who they are, click here. |
|
COVID cash is driving companies to suppress the inconvenient truth. They are being aided and abetted by naive or deceitful governments who have effectively issued a blank cheque for this global medical experiment. It’s an appalling situation and the financial and health consequences will be felt for a very long time to come. The undercover Veritas video has scientists admitting that the antibodies generated naturally in response to coronavirus infection are much better than the vaccines. This confirms the evidence we have highlighted previously. Unsurprisingly, this evidence has been dismissed by those who are profiting from the status quo. The ugly truth is that having COVID provides up to 27 times greater protection than having the vaccine. It’s also worth noting the virus has few or no implications for an overwhelming proportion of the population. Scientist Nick Karl had this to say on the video. ‘When somebody is naturally immune — like they got COVID — they probably have more antibodies against the virus…When you actually get the virus, you’re going to start producing antibodies against multiple pieces of the virus…So, your antibodies are probably better at that point than the [COVID] vaccination.’ He added his thoughts on why so much pressure was been placed on the unvaccinated. ‘The city [of New York] needs like vax cards and everything. It’s just about making it so inconvenient for unvaccinated people to the point where they’re just like, “F*ck it. I’ll get it.” You know?’ These observations were confirmed by a second Pfizer insider while another scientist discussed the suppression of information deemed detrimental to the company. Rahul Khandke is recorded as saying: ‘We’re bred and taught to be like, “vaccine is safer than actually getting COVID.” Honestly, we had to do so many seminars on this. You have no idea. Like, we have to sit there for hours and hours and listen to like — be like, “you cannot talk about this in public”.’ There was also the admission that Pfizer were conducting tests to see if the vaccine causes myocarditis (inflammation of the heart) in young people. ‘So, yeah, we’re doing, we just sent, like, 3,000 patients’ samples to get tested for like, elevated troponin levels (to detect heart attack) to see if it’s vaccine based — or so...’ It all paints a disgusting picture of a huge company making billions of dollars through the misplaced fear generated by this pandemic. There are no long-term studies as to whether these vaccines are safe or not. The truth is, the study is being conducted on the community in real time. With tens of billions of dollars at stake, it’s no surprise that those profiting have a vested interest in keeping the fear going, especially as they have been given total immunity for any consequences by panicked and pathetic governments. Have a great day. Best, Cory Bernardi, For The Rum Rebellion PS: To sign up to Cory’s free weekly email, Cory Bernardi Confidential, click here. Advertisement: The next gold rush… in New Zealand? All the details — including the gold stock tapping the largest Kiwi reserves — are in Brian Chu’s latest monthly edition of Rock Stock Insider. Learn how to get access — along with five other extremely compelling stock plays — by CLICKING HERE. |
|
|