| | MEF Dispatch: USAID's Funding of Jihad Exposed By Winfield Myers ● Feb 04, 2025 Smart Brevity® count: 6.5 mins...1766 words A new in-depth MEF report reveals that the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has given $164 million taxpayer dollars to Islamist groups, including $122 million to groups aligned with designated terrorists and their supporters, justifies the ongoing overhaul of the agency. President Trump’s off-the-cuff remarks that Egypt and Jordan should accept Gazan refugees is unwise and harmful to U.S. policy, writes Daniel Pipes. Yet, his comments did expose the hypocrisy of those states that profess loyalty to the Palestinian cause but rarely, if ever, do anything to help “actual, living Palestinians,” observes Jonathan Spyer. Spyer writes elsewhere that, despite an official declaration, the many competing factions within Syria mean that Ahmed al-Sharaa’s “‘presidency of the country’ is more aspiration than reality.” Three articles analyze Turkish President Erdoğan’s ongoing Islamization of his country, beginning with his subversion of the legacy of Turkey’s founder Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, who championed secularism and Westernization. Next, we examine how hyper-nationalists, with Erdoğan’s aid, inserted radical programs into Turkey’s public education system, the better to brainwash the rising generation. We end with Michael Rubin’s call for the U.S. to designate Turkey’s Islamist and violent intelligence agency MİT as a foreign terrorist organization. | ICYMI: “The Islamist Struggle for Libya” with Mark I. Choate Islamist groups play a pivotal role in post-Qaddafi Libya and are a central factor in the country’s continued instability. The Muslim Brotherhood, Salafi factions, and jihadist groups compete for influence and power. Some Islamist organizations have integrated into political institutions, while others operate outside the system as armed militias. What role do Libya’s Islamists play in the struggle for Libya’s future? What are current trends? How should external actors approach them?
Mark I. Choate is an associate professor of history at Brigham Young University and teaches courses on the history of Europe, the world, the military, colonialism, migration, fascism, and terrorism. He is the author of Emigrant Nation: The Making of Italy Abroad (Harvard University Press, 2008). He holds a B.A., M.A., M.Phil., and Ph.D. in history from Yale University. To watch the full podcast episode, click here. | MEF Report Justifies the Overhaul at USAID News from the Middle East Forum Days after the Middle East Forum's (MEF) report exposed USAID's financial ties to Islamist organizations, the Trump administration announced a sweeping overhaul of the agency. Why it matters for MEF and beyond: The report reveals $164 million in USAID grants linked to terrorist entities, prompting urgent reform to safeguard U.S. foreign aid integrity. -
The Trump administration's restructuring aligns with MEF's mission to identify and counter extremist funding. -
This decisive action underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in government operations.
The findings in detail: MEF's investigation highlights USAID's financial support to groups affiliated with Hamas and Al Qaeda, raising critical oversight questions. The stakes for MEF: Reforming USAID is crucial to prevent further misuse of taxpayer funds, a cause that MEF ardently supports. To read the full press release, click here. | Terror Finance at the State Department and USAID The Middle East Forum's research reveals that the U.S. State Department and USAID have allocated significant funds to organizations with ties to designated Islamist terrorist groups. Why it matters: Misallocation of federal funds to extremist-linked groups undermines U.S. national security and misuses taxpayer dollars. -
These funds empower radical entities, potentially increasing global terrorism risks. -
The lack of rigorous vetting highlights systemic inadequacies in grant oversight.
The big picture: USAID and the State Department have granted millions to radical Muslim organizations, some directly aligned with Hamas and other terrorist groups. -
USAID beneficiaries openly express antisemitic sentiments and praised violence against Jews. -
Leading American charities have repeatedly failed in vetting their partners, with little federal accountability.
Details: The Middle East Forum's findings indicate $164 million in grants to Islamist groups, with $122 million linked to terrorist supporters. -
Organizations like the Bayader Association and ANERA received substantial USAID funding despite ties to Hamas. -
The Tides Foundation and InterAction have also been implicated, highlighting the need for stricter oversight.
To read the full report, click here. | By: Daniel Pipes In a rash move, Donald Trump suggested relocating Gazans, potentially using tariffs against Egypt and Jordan if they refuse to take them. Why it matters: Such an approach risks destabilizing key Middle Eastern allies and could lead to diplomatic fallout. -
Trump's threats of economic penalties may push Egypt and Jordan closer to other powers like China. -
The forced relocation idea contradicts U.S. foreign policy norms and could harm America's global standing.
The backlash: Middle Eastern leaders, including Egypt's President el-Sisi and Jordan's Foreign Minister Safadi, have strongly opposed the idea, warning of regional instability. The stakes: Trump's spontaneous foreign policy threats could isolate the U.S. from its allies and undermine efforts for peace in the region. To read the full article, click here. | Trump Has Exposed the Hypocrisy of Gaza’s Allies By: Jonathan Spyer Donald Trump has criticized Arab and Muslim states for their inconsistency in supporting the Palestinian cause, highlighting their reluctance to offer real aid to Gazans. Why it matters: Despite vocal support for Palestinians, these countries often fail to provide tangible help, exposing a gap between rhetoric and action. -
Trump's call for Egypt and Jordan to accept Gazans reveals the unwillingness of these states to take decisive action. -
Arab nations' refusal to offer refuge contrasts sharply with their public claims of solidarity.
The contradiction: While media outlets decry a "genocide," neighboring countries have not offered Gazans sanctuary, contradicting claims of humanitarian concern. The stakes: Trump's disruptive approach challenges the status quo, pushing for a reevaluation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. To read the full article, click here. | Syria Has a New Government—or Does It? By: Jonathan Spyer Ahmed al-Sharaa, claiming Syria's presidency, faces a nation fragmented by competing factions and ongoing conflict. Why it matters: The declaration of a new government by al-Sharaa's HTS group doesn't reflect reality, as Syria remains deeply divided. -
The Syrian Democratic Forces, controlling a significant portion of the country, reject centralized Islamist rule. -
Various factions, including the Druze Rijal al Karama and Sunni Arab militias, continue to resist HTS dominance.
The complexity: Al-Sharaa's HTS lacks the manpower to enforce control nationwide, with only limited influence in Damascus and Idlib. -
Many regions, including the third of the country ruled by U.S.-aligned, Kurdish-dominated Syrian Democratic Forces, remain outside HTS's control.
The stakes: Western officials must recognize Syria's fractured state before engaging with al-Sharaa's government. To read the full article, click here. | The PKK Is Truer to Atatürk’s Vision than Erdoğan By: Michael Rubin Erdoğan manipulates Turkish nationalism to distract from his Islamist agenda and financial failures as he undermines the secular vision of modern Turkey's founding father, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk. Why it matters: Erdoğan's policies diverge significantly from Atatürk's ideals, as he promotes Islamism over secularism and represses Kurdish rights. -
Turkey's economy is faltering under Erdoğan, with inflation eroding citizens' quality of life. -
His attacks on the PKK reflect a broader strategy to divert attention from domestic failures.
The irony: While Erdoğan perverts Atatürk's legacy, the PKK and Syrian Kurds embody principles closer to his vision. The stakes: Erdoğan's leadership threatens Turkey's secular foundations, as his administration prioritizes religious conservatism over democratic values. To read the full article, click here. | Hyper-Nationalists Commandeer Turkish Public Education Programs By: Abdullah Bozkurt A new protocol allows Turkey's far-right Ülkü Ocakları Education and Culture Foundation to infiltrate public education, highlighting the country's shift towards extremism under Erdoğan. Why it matters: This move risks turning educational programs into platforms for radicalization, undermining democratic values. -
The protocol grants Ülkü Ocakları access to millions of studentsin order to indoctrinate them with ultranationalist ideologies. -
With the group's history of violence and crime, their influence in education poses a threat to societal stability.
The implications: Critics argue that the protocol violates laws prohibiting political propaganda in education, yet Erdoğan's regime remains unchallenged. The stakes: This development could further polarize Turkey, turning the population even more against religious and ethnic minorities. To read the full article, click here. | Designate Turkey’s Intelligence Service to Be a Terror Organization By: Michael Rubin Evidence shows Turkey's National Intelligence Organization (MİT) operates similarly to a foreign terrorist group, warranting global scrutiny. Why it matters: MİT's actions include supporting terror groups and targeting dissidents, challenging international norms. -
The U.S. and allies should reconsider their stance on MİT and treat it as they do Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. -
Designating MİT as a terrorist organization could curb its unchecked activities globally.
The activities: MİT aids groups like ISIS and Hamas, and conducts assassinations internationally. The stakes: Ignoring MİT's behavior risks emboldening state-sponsored terror activities. To read the full article, click here. | | From in-depth research exposing taxpayer-funded grants to Islamists, to original analyses and reporting on Israel, Gaza, Syria, Turkey, and beyond, the Middle East Forum offers readers the information and explanations you need to stay informed. Count on the next issue of the Dispatch for updated reports on these and other pressing issues. Sincerely, Winfield Myers Managing Editor, MEF Director, Campus Watch | Was this edition useful? Your responses are anonymous | MEF, an activist think tank, deals with the Middle East, Islamism, U.S. foreign policy, and related topics, urging bold measures to protect Americans and their allies. Pursuing its goals via intellectual and operational means, the Forum recurrently has policy ideas adopted by the U.S. government.
Copyright © 2024 Middle East Forum, All rights reserved.
Our mailing address is:
Middle East Forum 1650 Market Street, Suite 3600 Philadelphia, PA 19103 |
| | Powered by | This email was sent by Middle East Forum via Axios HQ |
|
|