Curated commentary; timely topics View web version

What will free speech mean in a new Twitter?

In the Twitterverse, infosec and non-infosec people weighed in with a mix of trepidation, agitation, and confusion.

Some questioned exactly what free speech would mean should policies change. Would it mean that harassing and threat-filled content would no longer be reported and removed?

Lesley Carhart, a popular Twitter user who serves as director of incident response for North America at the industrial cybersecurity company Dragos, and tweets under the handle @hacks4pancakes, noted “I don’t talk about this a lot. However, any move that makes vulnerable people more cavalierly accessible to consistent and targeted abuse is very concerning to me, and I’m definitely an advocate for free speech.”

Carhart, who noted she herself is often on the receiving end of threats and harassment also shared another tweet from Twitch user in which the user shows a visualization of the harassment she recently received in the online gaming forum and it’s as awful as you might imagine. In a retweet, Carhart added her own comment to the picture and said “What totally unrestricted speech turns out like on social media.”

Others simply lamented that the headlines of Musk’s purchase, and his near non-stop tweeting since news broke (Musk has always been an active Twitter user), would sully the tone of the network’s overall experience.

Eva Galperin, director of cybersecurity with EFF (@evacide) tweeted “I am filled with dread. My timeline is just going to be full of people commenting on every one of Elon's sh*tposts the way it was full of people commenting on that other guy's sh*tposts from 2016 through 2020, isn't it?”

And then others advocated for a wait-and-see attitude. Information security architect, author, and founder of the infosec community event QueerCon, Robert Walker (@TProphet) said, “To everyone saying "I don't like Elon so you can find me on $2022_equivalent_of_irc_channel_on_some_random_server" - there's a reason why irc died. Look, if Twitter gets wrecked we'll have to figure something else out but maybe we'll just get an edit button instead?”

Some questioned whether looser rules meant the network would become a forum for extremists who had previously been removed.

“A bunch of long-banned Nazis tried to start new accounts on Monday after the Elon Musk news broke. A lot of them got the boot within 24 hours,” tweeted Nick Martin, who authors The Informant, a publication that covers hate and extremism in the United States. “Elon Musk doesn’t even own Twitter yet, but those guys and a lot of other extremists decided the water was warm and tried to take a dip anyway. It was a brief flurry of slurs, harassment and threats. But ultimately they took the L. I don't know what the future will be for Nazis and white supremacists on Twitter.”


Formation of US disinformation division

In tandem with the Musk news, Nina Jankowicz (@wiczipedia), a global fellow at the Wilson Center and an author whose research focuses on disinformation, announced she has been named executive director of the Department of Homeland Security's new Disinformation Governance Board.

“Cat's out of the bag: here's what I've been up to the past two months, and why I've been a bit quiet on here. Honored to be serving in the Biden Administration @DHSgov and helping shape our counter-disinformation efforts,” she tweeted.

The news with met with plenty of enthusiasm and congratulations, as well as a lot of criticism by Twitter users who weighed in to call the effort unconstitutional, Orwellian, and even illegal.

It will be interesting what Twitter looks like under Musk’s leadership, but the end result is difficult to determine now amid all of the buzz.

Newsman Dan Rather (@DanRather) tweeted that with or without the network, we will always find a means to voice our opinions.

“I stop scrolling, look up from my phone, and out the window. I see a complicated but beautiful world. It’s still going to be there no matter who owns Twitter. And we'll continue to find ways to live in it, talk about it, and share with each other our thoughts, fears, and dreams.”
 

How are we doing? We’d love to hear how you like this newsletter. Email us at idgnewsletters@idg.com

Related reading:

How disinformation creates insider threats

Employees who believe disinformation are more susceptible to social engineering and phishing campaigns, and attackers know it. Read More.

 

Disinformation and digital disappearance

Former skip tracer Frank Ahearn says disinformation is a key strategy for "disappearing" digitally. Excerpted from chapter 7 of his book How to Disappear CompletelyRead More.

 

Twitter VIP account hack highlights the danger of insider threats

The hijacking of Twitter accounts belonging to high-profile individuals and brands is the perfect example of the impact a malicious or duped insider and poor privileged access monitoring could have on businesses. Read More.

 

About the Author
Joan Goodchild is a veteran writer and editor with 20+ years experience. She writes about information security and strategy and is the former editor in chief of CSO. 

Linkedin Facebook Twitter YouTube
Privacy Policy | Manage Your Subscriptions | Unsubscribe
Advertise with us! | More Newsletters | Our Brands
©2022 IDG Communications, Inc.
140 Kendrick Street
Building B
Needham, MA 02494