New Post on the Day on Torts dated 07/19/2024
View this email in your browser

Day on Torts

Published by Day on Torts — Tennessee Personal Injury Attorney — The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.

Cheatham County Tort Case Statistics and Outcomes – July 1, 2017- June 30, 2023

By The Law Offices of John Day, P.C. on Jul 18, 2024 06:00 am

The following graphs demonstrate the resolution of personal injury, wrongful death, and other tort cases in Cheatham County, Tennessee during the last six fiscal years ending June 30, 2023.

BirdDog Law shares this information for every county in Tennessee. Click on BirdDog’s County Pages, go to the county of choice, and click on Court Statistics.

Click on the link for more information on the Cheatham County court system.


Read in browser »
share on Twitter Like Cheatham County Tort Case Statistics and Outcomes – July 1, 2017- June 30, 2023 on Facebook

No duty to warn where booster seat was made dangerous by addition of aftermarket part.

By The Law Offices of John Day, P.C. on Jul 17, 2024 06:00 am

Where a child’s booster seat was only dangerous because it was used in conjunction with an aftermarket seat belt extender, the booster seat manufacturer had no duty to warn purchasers of that potential danger under Tennessee products liability law.

In Woodruff v. Ford Motor Company, No. E2023-00488-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. May 28, 2024), plaintiff’s husband was killed and her children were severely injured in a car accident. At the time of the accident, her husband was driving a Nissan vehicle. Her son sat in the back seat in a booster seat manufactured by defendant. Because the car had recessed seat belt receivers, the husband had added a seat belt extender to the back seat belt and used it on the seat belt securing the son in the booster seat. The seat belt extender was not manufactured by the same company as the booster seat and had no affiliation with the booster seat.

After the accident, plaintiff filed this products liability case against several manufacturers and sellers. (See this post for a separate opinion in this case affirming summary judgment for Ford Motor Company as the manufacturer of the seat belt extender). Relevant to this opinion, the trial court granted summary judgment to defendant booster seat manufacturer, finding that defendant had no duty to warn about a seat belt extender that it did not manufacture or sell. The Court of Appeals affirmed this ruling.


Read in browser »
share on Twitter Like No duty to warn where booster seat was made dangerous by addition of aftermarket part. on Facebook



 

Recent Articles:

Fayette County Tort Case Statistics and Outcomes – July 1, 2017- June 30, 2023
Manufacturer not liable for seat belt extender used on booster seat
Warren County Tort Case Statistics and Outcomes – July 1, 2017- June 30, 2023
Franklin County Tort Case Statistics and Outcomes – July 1, 2017- June 30, 2023
Optional arbitration agreement at nursing home was legal decision.
Copyright © 2024 The Law Offices of John Day, P.C., All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in at our website

Our mailing address is:
The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
5141 Virginia Way
#270
Brentwood, TN 37027

Add us to your address book


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp