  Examining the intersection of cryptocurrency and government By Nikhilesh De Managing Editor, Global Policy & Regulation Oct. 26, 2021 If you were forwarded this newsletter and would like to receive it, sign up here. Sponsored by 
Hey folks,
Welcome to State of Crypto, a CoinDesk newsletter looking at the intersection of cryptocurrency and government. I’m your host, Nikhilesh De. You’re probably here because you signed up, but in case you're not a fan, you can unsubscribe here.
Major players in the crypto industry want favorable regulations, and they’re actively explaining their own visions.
—Nik
Policy week  Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong (CoinDesk archives) The narrative There’s a growing push from the crypto industry to suggest how regulators can approach this rapidly-growing sector. Why it matters Crypto exchanges Coinbase and FTX, venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) and the Digital Dollar Foundation have all recently published suggested policy proposals for addressing the digital asset market, ranging from creating a dedicated regulator for crypto to detailing how a central bank digital currency could address privacy issues.
Clearly, the industry is hoping to have a hand in creating a favorable regulatory regime in the U.S. Breaking it down So, these proposals could be seen in two different ways. The first is as a serious policy push that industry players hope will one day come to fruition. The other is an effort to kickstart a conversation around how crypto should be regulated.
I was in Washington, D.C., last week meeting folks both from industry and from the offices of various lawmakers and it’s really not yet clear to me what sort of traction these industry-driven proposals will gain. Ignoring for a minute the difficulties in passing a bill through both the House and Senate, the proposals themselves would require buy-in from a broad swath of both regulators and the lawmakers overseeing them.
Much of the reception to these proposals has been that they may all be nonstarters. Lawmakers aren’t interested in letting the crypto industry define the terms of its regulatory framework for various reasons, according to some of the individuals I spoke to. On a substantive level, even crypto-friendly lawmakers seem to disagree with the premise of pouring excessive resources into developing novel tools for overseeing crypto.
Tweets and public statements lambasting regulators are also not impressing the lawmakers who might look at these proposals. They might even be counterproductive if the goal is to be taken seriously, say Washington insiders.
(Seriously, it’s kind of amazing how many different people brought up recent tweets as examples of how to not make a case for favorable crypto regulation.)
If these proposals aren’t meant to be taken literally, but rather as a spark for conversation, then they may actually be going somewhere. While the proposals themselves are varied in scope, they share some common themes: being precise in defining terms, calling for greater transparency and user privacy concerns.
We know that the President’s Working Group on Financial Markets plans to publish its stablecoin report soon, which will call for Congress to enact legislation treating stablecoin issuers like banks. One of a16z’s proposals recommended something similar, which may be helpful for lawmakers who are looking for industry input if they try to craft this kind of bill.
Clearer definitions of tokens may also help, for the crowd which sees a distinction between utility tokens and security tokens. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has so far maintained that there’s no real difference in the U.S., but safe harbor proposals from Commissioner Hester Peirce and Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) would create these distinctions if enacted, which startups and other industry advocates would benefit from.
It’s clear regulations are coming. It’s also likely pushback will be involved along the way. One project may know that better than most.
Novi’s first steps Novi, Facebook’s digital wallet subsidiary, announced a small pilot project last week in partnership with stablecoin issuer Paxos and crypto exchange Coinbase’s custody wing. Under the terms of the pilot project, which will launch in the U.S. and Guatemala, Novi customers can purchase Paxos Dollars (USDP) and the company will store the funds with Coinbase Custody.
Just hours later, five U.S. Democratic Senators published an open letter ordering Facebook to cease and desist, adding on an order to discontinue work on Diem for good measure.
Even though only Democrats signed the letter, I’m told that a dislike of Facebook is one of the few truly bipartisan issues in Washington right now.
The bad news for Diem, and by extension projects like Novi, is that it’s also maybe inextricably linked to Facebook due to how the social media giant announced the project in 2019.
Novi, of course, is also a direct subsidiary to Facebook, which likely didn’t help it on the reputational front last week.
A lot of the current conversation around stablecoin regulation can trace its origins back to the original Libra announcement, and while the industry has changed since then, the perception of Facebook hasn’t really. Recent reports around Facebook won’t help.
The thing to watch for now is whether Facebook will continue with its pilot project or proceed to a full launch of the Novi wallet or whether it will suspend these operations in light of Congressional opposition.
Diem, which is a separate entity, faces a similar question. A few months ago it announced it was partnering with Silvergate Bank to launch a dollar-pegged stablecoin pending regulatory approvals. These approvals are still pending and there isn’t a clear timeline right now for when this may launch.
A message from Soldex.ai  Soldex.ai is attempting to make the trading of crypto more accessible and straightforward with the use of artificial intelligence. Beyond its innovative AI trading capabilities, Soldex offers many additional features over other DEXs. Since it is natively built on the Solana blockchain, it resolves many of the infrastructure issues apparent in older systems. It is relatively quick and cheap to use compared to anything built on Ethereum.
Using Soldex exchange Traders will have the possibility of 24/7 trading and receiving maximum results. Developers will be able to lend the trading bot for success commissions. This would provide the community with incentives for further development of Soldex AI through voting rights.
Be part of the Soldex community and join the ongoing SOLX private sale. To participate you can visit soldex.ai or contact sales@soldex.ai
The Biden Bunch Changing of the guard  Key: (nom.) = nominee, (rum.) = rumored, (act.) = acting, (inc.) = incumbent (no replacement anticipated) Acting CFTC Chair Rostin Behnam will face the Senate Agriculture Committee tomorrow in a hearing considering his nomination to serve a full term as chair.
Elsewhere 
A message from Aimedis  Aimedis - an eHealth platform based on blockchain technology, which has been developed since 2017 and released in the current version 2020 for web, iOS and Android. Aimedis combines all relevant eHealth applications such as health records, video chat with doctors, appointments, prescriptions, second opinions, wearables, medical social media communication, eLearning, a unique medical and scientific-pharmaceutical NFT marketplace, while displaying all relevant operations in a private blockchain visible and transparent for the patient.
Beyond CoinDesk 
Today's Tweet 
If you’ve got thoughts or questions on what I should discuss next week, or any other feedback you’d like to share, feel free to email me at nik@coindesk.com or find me on Twitter @nikhileshde.
You can also join the group conversation on Telegram.
See ya’ll next week!
State of Crypto A newsletter from CoinDesk Copyright © 2021 CoinDesk, All rights reserved. 250 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10003, USA Manage your newsletter subscriptions | Unsubscribe from all CoinDesk email |