  How policy and regulation impact the crypto world – and the other way around By Nikhilesh De Managing Editor, Global Policy & Regulation July 6, 2021 Sponsored by  If you were forwarded this newsletter and would like to receive it, sign up here.
Hey folks,
Welcome to State of Crypto, a CoinDesk newsletter looking at the intersection of cryptocurrency and government. I’m your host, Nikhilesh De. You’re probably here because you signed up, but in case you're not a fan, you can unsubscribe here.
A subcommittee within the House Financial Services Committee held a hearing on recent trading and volatility within the crypto markets last week that largely appeared to be a fact-finding mission and exploration of this relatively young marketplace. And interestingly enough, witnesses both from the crypto industry and from outside the space all agreed that some form of increased regulatory clarity is needed.
—Nik
Political donations  The narrative We keep seeing the phrase “regulatory clarity” come up during Congressional hearings around crypto investing, central bank digital currencies and what possible regulations around this industry could look like. But what does that phrase actually mean? Why it matters Businesses and proponents within the crypto industry see vague regulations as a major issue preventing startups from succeeding in the U.S. Lawmakers are hearing this too. It’s not yet clear what the result will be, though. Breaking it down I’ve talked about regulatory clarity a few times in this newsletter. In the U.S. at least, it’s sort of this ideal framework in which companies in the industry know what qualifies as a security vs. what is for sure a commodity or what circumstances would allow a company to sell tokens or pay employees using cryptocurrency, etc. In other words, regulatory clarity would entail companies knowing what exactly they are allowed to do.
So why aren’t we there yet? The chief issue is there isn’t a single federal regulator that can provide this oversight (or is willing to). The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulates securities, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) regulates everything else, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency regulates banks and national trusts and individual states decide which exchanges to give licenses to, etc. (this is a bit of a simplification).
The witnesses at a House Financial Services Committee hearing on the crypto market last week advocated differing approaches to this issue, but the overall conclusion is clear: Regulators need to actually issue some sort of concrete guidance around what activities are allowed, or legislators need to give one entity the authority to do so. We’re seeing this refrain more and more, especially with the recent bull market.
“One regulator says that a crypto asset is a currency. Another said that it is a security. And the outcome of that is incredibly harmful to retail customers,” said Christine Parker, one of the witnesses at the hearing. “This lack of clarity stifles innovation in the U.S. and frankly drives retail customers to foreign exchanges. So how do we better regulate cryptos?”
Parker, a partner at Reed Smith LLP, advocated for Congress to require the SEC and CFTC to provide clearer rules.
“I don’t know if there’s a right way or wrong way but we need to do something,” said Perianne Boring, the founder and president of the Chamber of Digital Commerce after the hearing.
The solution may lie within existing laws, but with better and more consistent enforcement, said Rep. Tom Emmer.
Peter Van Valkenburgh, director of research at Coin Center and one of the witnesses at the hearing, indicated that some regulators have already begun demonstrating how existing laws apply to the digital asset industry.
“Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum are commodities but many crypto assets meet the flexible definition of an investment contract and are therefore securities which means their issuance and their trading are regulated by the SEC. Cryptocurrency derivatives are regulated by the CFTC,” he said.
Still, the tone of the hearing was generally positive, industry insiders said.
“Today’s hearing was a good example of months of education on Capitol Hill. Both Democrats and Republicans asked good pointed questions in regards to securities law, regulatory clarity, consumer protection, ransomware and fostering innovation in the U.S.,” said Ron Hammond, director of government relations at the Blockchain Association. “This hearing was unique in terms of the number of Members of Congress who were vocally supportive of the technology and application of cryptocurrency versus those who were skeptical.”
Boring noted that Rep. Maxine Waters’ participation in the hearing is “a strong signal” that the overall committee is continuing to focus on crypto.
“It did seem more like a fact-finding mission,” she said.
In a statement, Coin Center Director of Communications Neeraj Agrawal said the think tank was “pleased to see that so many members of Congress” have continued researching the sector.
“Our best bet for sound policy outcomes is a broad understanding of these technologies,” Agrawal said. “The growing number of policymakers knowledgeable about cryptocurrency is a good sign.”
A message from Mandala  Did you know Mandala Exchange has over 1,000+ active trading pairs WITH Binance liquidity & security?!
Join our 320k Club and trade with fees as low as 0.05% by locking our exchange token $MDXT
Sign Up Today, Trade Confidently & Securely with Mandala Exchange, powered by Binance Cloud.
The Biden Bunch Changing of the guard  Key: (nom.) = nominee, (rum.) = rumored, (act.) = acting, (inc.) = incumbent (no replacement anticipated) Still nothing to report here really.
A message from Saïd Business School, University of Oxford and Esme Learning  Embrace the Fintech Revolution with the Oxford Fintech Programme. Saïd Business School, University of Oxford and Esme Learning are working in partnership to deliver the Oxford Fintech Programme, a six week, online course accessing critical industry and academic insights. You’ll gain foundational knowledge and explore emergent fintech trends from a global perspective, as part of an immersive cohort through a world-class centre of learning, teaching and research. As a CoinDesk subscriber, you can receive a 15% reduction on the programme fee when you register to attend.
Elsewhere 
CoinDesk Research Report on Bitcoin's Taproot Upgrade  The Investor’s Perspective on the Bitcoin Taproot Upgrade
Taproot is a bundle of three upgrades to Bitcoin aimed at improving network security, privacy and scalability. At the same time, it poses some potential drawbacks to Bitcoin including risks of low adoption, unintended privacy shortcomings and Bitcoin community disappointment and fracturing.
CoinDesk Research's newest report dives into the economic impact and investment implications of the Taproot upgrade.
Outside CoinDesk 
Today's Tweet 
If you’ve got thoughts or questions on what I should discuss next week, or any other feedback you’d like to share, feel free to email me at nik@coindesk.com or find me on Twitter @nikhileshde.
You can also join the group conversation on Telegram.
See ya’ll next week!
ATTENTION: Scammers have been sending fraudulent emails with links to sites disguised to look like coindesk.com. If you are in doubt about a link, type https://www.coindesk.com directly into your browser; do not copy and paste. Remember, if something seems too good to be true, it probably is.
Copyright © 2021 CoinDesk, All rights reserved.
250 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10003, USA You can manage your preferences here or unsubscribe from all CoinDesk email. |