No Images? Click here The Weekly is a rundown of news by the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission highlighting the week’s top news stories from the public square and providing commentary on the big issues of our day. Supreme Court to Decide If States Can Force Pro-life Pregnancy Centers to Promote AbortionWhat just happened? On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to decide the constitutionality of a California state law that forces pro-life pregnancy centers to promote abortion. What does the California law require the pregnancy centers to do? The Reproductive FACT (Freedom, Accountability, Comprehensive Care, and Transparency) Act requires that CPCs “disseminate a notice to all clients, as specified, stating, among other things, that California has public programs that provide immediate free or low-cost access to comprehensive family planning services, prenatal care, and abortion, for eligible women.” The law requires the notice to state: “California has public programs that provide immediate free or low-cost access to comprehensive family planning services (including all FDA-approved methods of contraception), prenatal care, and abortion for eligible women. To determine whether you qualify, contact the county social services office at [insert the telephone number].” This information must be disclosed to women who come to a CPC in one of the following ways: (A) A public notice posted in a conspicuous place where individuals wait that may be easily read by those seeking services from the facility. The notice shall be at least 8.5 inches by 11 inches and written in no less than 22-point type. (B) A printed notice distributed to all clients in no less than 14-point type. (C) A digital notice distributed to all clients that can be read at the time of check-in or arrival, in the same point type as other digital disclosures. A printed notice as described in subparagraph (B) shall be available for all clients who cannot or do not wish to receive the information in a digital format. The law also forces non-medical pregnancy centers to add to all advertisements a large disclosures in multiple languages about their non-medical status. Violation of this law results in a fine of $500 for a first offense and then $1,000 for each subsequent offense. What is the significance of this case? The state of California and the Ninth Circuit are claiming that the state has an interest in forcing clinics to promote a particular view about abortion. Requiring pro-life pregnancy centers to promote abortion violates their constitutionally protected rights of conscience and free speech by forcing them to advertise for groups like Planned Parenthood Was this law passed to target pro-life pregnancy centers? Yes. As ADF has pointed out, the California law not only forces pro-life groups to advertise for the abortion industry, the law exempts abortion-performing facilities and other healthcare providers. Why would the Supreme Court overturn the law? Several federal courts have invalidated or mostly invalidated laws similar to the FACT Act in Austin, Texas; Montgomery County, Maryland; Baltimore; and New York City. As ADF notes, the 9th Circuit’s ruling conflicts with other circuits and with previous decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court itself. This week on ERLC podcasts: Daniel Darling talks to Alistair Begg about Spurgeon, pastoral leadership, and Cleveland sports. On the Capitol Conversations podcast, Matthew Hawkins, Travis Wussow, and Jeff Pickering discuss the adoption tax credit, the Conscience Protection Act, and DACA. And on the new ERLC podcast series, “How to Handle,” Trillia Newbell talks to Jimmy and Kelly Needham about overcoming pornography. Other IssuesAmerican CultureReport: FBI May Be Investigating Planned Parenthood’s Dealings in Aborted Body Parts
BioethicsThe First Man to Have His Genes Edited Inside His Body
Christianity and CultureTexas church survivors and supporters hold services 1 week after mass shooting
Some churches putting faith in their guns to fend off mass shootings
The Church of England is encouraging primary school students to explore their gender identity
Family IssuesBalancing Paid Work and Kids
International IssuesVietnam Wrestles With Christianity
Australians say 'yes' to same-sex marriage
The ethnic cleansing of the Rohingya is visible from space
USCIRF Says State Department Is Late In Designating "Countries of Particular Concern"
Religious LibertyERLC, others urge conscience protection this year
A Closer Look at State Religious Freedom Legislation
State Lawsuits Against Contraception Mandate Exceptions Would Gut Religious Liberty
The First Amendment Protects a Dissenting Cake Baker, Not State Coercion
Sexuality IssuesSex abuse prevention resources available at sbc.net
The Pentagon will pay for a soldier's sex-reassignment surgery for the first time
|