The primary season isn't technically over, but if you're Hillary Clinton, the finish line is visible. She all but locked up the Democratic nomination for president last week, and this week she's pivoting directly to attacking GOP front-runner Donald Trump. While speaking Monday to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, one of the most important …
 
The 5-Minute Fix
Keeping up with politics is easy now
 
 

The primary season isn't technically over, but if you're Hillary Clinton, the finish line is visible. She all but locked up the Democratic nomination for president last week, and this week she's pivoting directly to attacking GOP front-runner Donald Trump.

While speaking Monday to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, one of the most important and influential interest groups in the nation, Clinton suggested that Trump is "dangerously wrong" on Israel and implied he's a close-minded bully: "If you see bigotry oppose it, if you see violence condemn it, if you see a bully stand up to him," she said.

Hillary Clinton speaking to AIPAC on Monday. (Andrew Harnik/AP)

Clinton didn't mention Trump by name, but her comments make clear he's on her mind. In fact, Clinton's team is building an attack manual for this fall where she will bash Trump's business acumen, highlight his eyebrow-raising comments about women and minorities, and zero in on his thin political resume. Clinton's goal is to take down Trump where others (read: Republican candidates) have failed, report The Washington Post's Anne Gearan and Abby Phillip.

Trump is set to speak to AIPAC later Monday, so we'll have to see how he reacts to Clinton's barbs. But Trump has already demonstrated he's not afraid to get personal when it comes to Clinton; remember that time he described Clinton's bathroom break during a Democratic debate as "disgusting?" And in January he called her husband "one of the great women abusers of all time."

In other words, the general election hasn't even begun, but it's already taken a turn for the negative. You have been warned.

A big reason for the above? Unpopularity.

One of the big reasons things are likely to devolve into the realm of the nasty is that both of the most-likely nominees — Trump and Clinton — are unpopular. In fact, if it weren't for Trump, Clinton would enter the 2016 general election alongside the more unpopular nominees ever.

Much like Utahns, the American public really dislikes Trump. In fact, the 67 percent of Americans who rated Trump as "unfavorable" in a recent Washington Post-ABC News poll would be the highest unfavorability rating of any candidate who became a major-party nominee in three decades. "It's hard to overstate how bad Trump's numbers are with all Americans," writes The Post's Emily Guskin in The Fix.

Here's one way Guskin helps us put it in perspective: The only presidential candidate in the past few decades Americans have disliked more than Trump is former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke, who ran for president in 1992.

David Duke, the former Ku Klux Klansman, greets supporters in a Metairie, La. hotel Saturday, May 1, 1999. Former Gov. Dave Treen led the race Saturday to replace Bob Livingston in the House while Duke and three others vied for second place and a spot in a May 29 runoff. (AP Photo/J. Pat Carter)

David Duke also ran for Congress in 1999 (J. Pat Carter/AP)

Clinton's highest measured unfavorable rating, meanwhile, is 53 percent — from August — and remains in that general vicinity.

And what do you do when people don't really like you? You make them like the other candidate even less.

Let's do some pivoting of our own to talk about Tuesday's elections

The presidential campaign on both sides moves West for contests in Utah and Arizona, plus Idaho's Democratic caucuses.

We're watching Utah, where one poll shows Trump is in third place, 42 points behind the state's favorite, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.). What's more, another poll shows Trump would lose to either Democrat in the presidential race. Let's pause for a second to take that in. Utah, one of the reddest states in the nation, would considering voting for Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) over the Republican front-runner.

ADVERTISEMENT
 

It's worth nothing that Trump hasn't done that well in heavily Mormon areas in Idaho and Nevada, two states with a relatively high amount of them. That could be what's happening in Utah, too, which is home to many more Mormons than any other state.

(Philip Bump / The Washington Post)

(Philip Bump / The Washington Post)

But The Fix's Philip Bump thinks Trump's unpopularity in Utah might be a broader issue. Bump notes that people who attend church regularly — a.k.a. "practicing Christians" — seem to really dislike Trump. A California-based research firm found no religious group had a more negative view of Donald Trump than practicing Christians, among which we could reasonably put most Mormons, according to religious surveys.

(Philip Bump / The Washington Post)

(Philip Bump / The Washington Post)

Losing Utah probably won't substantially shift the GOP presidential race's narrative, but the fact that one of the reddest states in the nation seems to hate Trump is an interesting data point, especially given how well Trump has performed in the Deep South.

Finally, let's talk Cuba

Bummer it was raining. (Carlos Barria/Reuters)

The other big political news Monday is, of course, President Obama's historic visit to Cuba. But just how historic is it?

Well, the last time a sitting U.S. president visited Cuba, Prohibition was still in place.

U.S. President Calvin Coolidge, second from left, and his wife, first lady Grace Coolidge, third from left, are shown with the President of Cuba General Gerardo Machado y Morales, right, and his wife, Elvira Machado, left, walk on the estate of President Machado in Havana, Cuba, Jan. 19, 1928. (AP Photo)

U.S. President Calvin Coolidge and his wife, first lady Grace Coolidge, at left, with Cuban President Gerardo Machado y Morales and his wife, Elvira Machado,  in Havana, Cuba, on Jan. 19, 1928. (AP)

President Calvin Coolidge and his family stopped by the island in 1928. The trip was a big deal at the time, writes The Post's Alison Michaels in The Fix. It was Coolidge's first international trip, and according to The Washington Post archives, the first time a U.S. president addressed "his people from foreign shores." It wasn't all fun, though. When Mr. and Mrs. Coolidge were offered cocktails, "they both met the situation by ignoring on one occasion and by sticking to water on another."

Clip from The Washington Post, Jan. 17, 1928.

Clip from The Washington Post, Jan. 17, 1928.

So the last president to visit Cuba couldn't drink in public. The next president plans his trip when it's raining. Maybe it's just bad luck?


Anyway, thanks for reading! We'll see you later this week with everything you need to know from Tuesday's election results, and more.

Because, Monday. (giphy.com)

Because, Monday. (giphy.com)

 
If you’re a new 5-Minute Fix reader, sign up here. If you’re a regular, forward this to anyone you think wants to sounds like they know what they’re talking about in 2016. And don’t forget to follow me on Twitter, which is where I take suggestions on gifs!

Thumb not tired yet // trying to avoid someone? Read these awesome pieces:
Donald Trump is redefining what it means to be ‘presidential’
Hand size. Yes, hand size.
 
Donald Trump just called Elizabeth Warren ‘the Indian.’ Here’s what that’s all about.
Warren's claim to Native American heritage became a major point of contention in a 2012 marquee Senate race.
 
Donald Trump is just about over this whole NATO thing
Trump says NATO "costs a fortune." That's relative. What we do know is that Republicans don't love it.
 
Donald Trump finally lost a head-to-head battle for cable TV coverage — to Obama
CNN, Fox News and MSNBC all aired President Obama live from Cuba, instead of Trump in Washington.
 
 
And the award for most awkward moment of the 2016 campaign goes to…
Cringe-fest.
 
Ex-top New York Times editor says the media — including the Times — is tougher on Hillary Clinton
Confirming the beliefs of Clinton supporters everywhere.
 
A majority say Merrick Garland should be confirmed. But that means less than you think.
Garland's numbers are very similar to other recent Supreme Court nominees.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Recommended for you
 
Fact Checker
Count the pinocchios. A weekly review of what's true, false or in-between.
Sign Up »
 
     
 
©2016 The Washington Post, 1301 K St NW, Washington DC 20071