Despite an unusual amount of grassroots pressure, the vast majority of the members of the electoral college voted Monday to represent how their state voted — not "their conscience" as some Hillary Clinton supporters had urged them to do. By Monday afternoon, the majority of the electoral college (270) voted for Donald J. Trump to be our 45th president. (Updates …
 
The 5-Minute Fix
Keeping up with politics is easy now
 
 

Despite an unusual amount of grassroots pressure, the vast majority of the members of the electoral college voted Monday to represent how their state voted — not "their conscience" as some Hillary Clinton supporters had urged them to do.

By Monday afternoon, the majority of the electoral college (270) voted for Donald J. Trump to be our 45th president. (Updates here.)

But Monday put the most strain put on the electoral college system in modern history. Shell-shocked Clinton supporters across the country seized on this usually arcane part of the U.S. presidential election process as a last-ditch hope Clinton would become president — or at least Trump wouldn't.

Their efforts were buoyed by two things:

1) Russia, and the assessment of the CIA and FBI it interfered with the U.S. elections by hacking and leaking embarrassing Democratic emails, which risked calling into question Trump's thin victory (his ranked 46th out of 58 electoral college results).

2) The rules of the electoral college, which is that really there are no rules.

In the end, neither was enough to change the election, nor thwart the way we've elected our presidents for hundreds of years. Still, there's a lasting echo in all of this drama: Can electoral college votes be changed via lobbying? To understand more, we have to better understand the electoral college.

How does the electoral college work again?

A protester in Pennsylvania. (Mark Makela/Getty Images)

Think of it kind of like a video game: Each state's popular vote is worth a different amount of points, based on population. So even though Clinton won the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes, under a point-based system, Trump won the majority of points (270) to become president.

These "points" are actually electors — 538 people in total. (538/2 = 269.). But other than the fact electors exist in each state, how the process works is not uniform. In fact, the Constitution doesn't actually tell us how electors are supposed to vote.

Electors are chosen a variety of ways. Some are chosen by their state's parties; California's are chosen by their congressional delegation. (Go figure: House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi's daughter is an elector. In New York, Bill Clinton is an an elector.) About a month after the election, the electors of each state get together and vote. Some vote by secret ballot, others out in the open. Some have to pay a fine if they don't vote the way their state voted, others don't.

Our founders had plenty of debate about how much freedom electors should have to use their discretion. Alexander Hamilton wanted these electors to make their own decisions about who to vote for. In the end, the winning argument was that these electors should vote the will of the people in their state, because any other outcome would be overturning the will of the voters. The vast majority of electors have done so ever since.

That longstanding tradition held in 2016, too, suggesting that for now, lobbying can't trump tradition.

ADVERTISEMENT
 

A dark tale of populism

Demonstrators hold Polish and EU flags during a protest outside the Parliament building in Warsaw, Poland, on Friday. (REUTERS/Kacper Pempel)

Months before President-elect Trump takes office, Europe and other parts of the world have been awash in right-wing populism. In Poland, the conservative Law and Justice Party came to power last year to on a pledge to drain the swamp of Polish politics.

Sound familiar? The Post's Berlin bureau chief, Anthony Faiola, thought so and went to Poland to investigate how it's going so far. He found a world of conspiracy theories, anti-government protests and, surprisingly for liberals, continued popularity for the party merging social conservatism and nationalism, despite controversial moves like:

  • proposing curriculum changes to downplay evolution theory and climate change and add hours for “patriotic” history lessons
  • a top equal rights officer suggested Polish hotels should not be forced to provide service to black or gay customers
  • defunding public assistance for in vitro fertilization treatments

Jacek Kucharczyk, president of the Warsaw-based Institute of Public Affairs, described Poland this way to Faiola: "We are living in this post-truth environment where you can say and do anything and people don’t seem to care."

How Trump's administration is shaping up

They're worth more than a third of American households.  Many of them have military experience, some of them have no government experience. Some have been criticized for ties to Russia, others have a record of wanting to get tough on Russia.

It's all getting a little confusing, so The Fix's Philip Bump to the rescue: He put together a diagram of what Trump's administration looks like so far. The big trend? Billionaires. Quite a few billionaires.

(Philip Bump / The Washington Post)

(Philip Bump / The Washington Post)

Thanks for reading! Keep sending me your burning questions about the year that was and the year that might be in politics.

Counter-programming. (giphy.com)

Counter programming. (giphy.com)

 
If you’re a new 5-Minute Fix reader, sign up here. If you’re a regular, forward this to anyone you think wants to sounds like they know what they’re talking about in 2016. And don’t forget to follow me on Twitter, which is where I take suggestions on gifs!

Thumb not tired yet // trying to avoid someone? Read these awesome pieces:
The tumultuous history of North Carolina’s bathroom bill, which is on its way to being repealed
An interesting twist in one of this year's most heated debates.
 
Now you can fact-check Trump’s tweets — in the tweets themselves
Trump's not very concerned about accuracy in his tweets — so we will be.
 
How Donald Trump leveraged the partisanship of Christmas
And how he now wants to fundraise off it.
 
Donald Trump tries to have it both ways on his supporters’ passion
Trump contradicted himself within a matter of two days.
 
 
How does the electoral college actually vote? An explainer.
Everything you need to know.
 
Four things we now know about the 2016 election
Trump lost the popular vote worse than 12 losing presidential candidates — and more!
 
Kellyanne Conway: Electors’ concern over Russian hacking allegations is ‘nonsense’
"The president-elect receives intelligence briefings that I am not privy to,” Conway said when asked why Trump's stance differed from that of the intelligence community.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Recommended for you
 
Wonkbook
Your daily cheat sheet on economic and domestic policy from Wonkblog.
Sign Up »
 
     
 
©2016 The Washington Post, 1301 K St NW, Washington DC 20071