News is still fluid, but police say they shot a man with a gun at the U.S. Capitol on Monday afternoon. Actually, the shooting didn't happen at the Capitol itself but rather a shiny marbled underground visitor center built eight years ago to protect the Capitol from such incidents. In 1983, when a bomb ripped open …
 
The 5-Minute Fix
Keeping up with politics is easy now
 
 

News is still fluid, but police say they shot a man with a gun at the U.S. Capitol on Monday afternoon.

Actually, the shooting didn't happen at the Capitol itself but rather a shiny marbled underground visitor center built eight years ago to protect the Capitol from such incidents.

(Washington Post graphics)

(Washington Post graphics)

In 1983, when a bomb ripped open a door where senators congregate, lawmakers started talking about building a center to a) welcome visitors and b) put distance between would-be attackers and the Capitol.

The project languished until a gunman blazed through a security checkpoint at the Capitol in 1998 and killed two police officers on his way into the halls of power. A security officer outside the office of then-Majority Whip Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) told aides to take cover and fought the gunman off before being fatally shot.

Construction on the Capitol Visitor Center started in 2000 and finished in 2008. Today, it is massive —with a theater, three auditoriums and the largest cafeteria in Washington. It can hold up to 4,000 tourists.

The lockdown at the Capitol has lifted, and police say one bystander suffered minor injuries, though they declined to say how. You can follow the latest here.

Is Bernie Sanders gaining momentum?

 (AP Photo/Chuck Burton)

(Chuck Burton/AP)

Over the weekend, Sen. Bernie Sanders (Vt.) trounced Hillary Clinton in not one but three contests, beating her by at least 40 points in caucuses in Alaska, Hawaii and Washington state.

His campaign maintains that everything's going according to plan, with Sanders slowly but surely chipping away at Clinton's lead.

Call us skeptical that plan will work. Sanders's win margin over the weekend does speak to his appeal among the Democratic base, but with the exception of Michigan, he is winning in states that, frankly, he should be winning in. Sanders does well in states where the Democratic electorate is mostly white and that hold the more time-consuming caucuses, which tend to favor Sanders's more enthusiastic supporters. When Sanders starts winning in large and diverse states such as California, then we'll talk.

Plus, how many states Sanders wins doesn't necessarily matter. Fix Boss Chris Cillizza reminds us of presidential politics 101: The only way to win a Democratic presidential primary in America is to win 2,383 delegates. And Clinton is besting Sanders in that category on two fronts.

1) She has got more delegates than Sanders because she has won the states offering more delegates by larger margins. In fact, she has a bigger lead over Sanders today than Barack Obama did over her in 2008:

(Philip Bump / The Washington Post)

(Philip Bump / The Washington Post)

2) She has got hundreds more superdelegates than Sanders, thanks to the 449 elected officials and former elected officials, such as members of Congress, who have pledged their support to her. Sanders has 29 superdelegates on his side. That could make the difference if this race ever got closer than it is now.

ADVERTISEMENT
 

The bottom line: In all, Clinton leads Sanders by 675 delegates, both super and not-so-super. She needs to win just a third of those still up for grabs to clinch the nomination. Sanders needs to win two-thirds and convince most of those superdelegates to switch their support from Clinton to him. So Sanders may indeed have had a great weekend. But Clinton has had an even better past few months, and, in the end, that's all that counts.

It's not all roses for Clinton

 (AP Photo/Kevin Lamarque, Pool, File)

(Pool photo by Kevin Lamarque via AP)

Remember those pesky emails? Specifically an investigation into whether Clinton improperly shared or received classified material when she exclusively used a private email address and server while secretary of state?

Well, The Washington Post's Robert O. Harrow Jr. reports that 147 FBI agents are looking into whether a crime was committed in handling classified material outside of government protocol. Clinton herself is not under investigation. But that's an eye-popping number of agents for something that Clinton has argued is a no-big-deal, Republican-motivated witch hunt, writes Fix Boss Cillizza.

A reminder on how we got here: The FBI got involved this summer after intelligence officials said they had reason to believe that Clinton's private server contained classified material. Clinton, who once denied having classified material on her server, has since said that it wasn't classified at the time. Legal officials told Harrow that they don't see a path in which Clinton herself could be in trouble for the emails since using a private server wasn't forbidden at the time, and past secretaries of state have sent or received work emails on their private emails on occasion. The investigation is nearing its end; we'll soon see what the almost 150 agents find out.

Why the debate over guns at the Republican convention is a big deal

(Ricky Carioti / The Washington Post)

(Ricky Carioti/The Washington Post)

When Republicans chose to hold their 2016 convention at Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland this summer, they probably didn't plan on the arena's do's and don'ts becoming a national story. But they are in a sticky situation now that an online petition to allow guns has gathered nearly 50,000 signatures even though the Secret Service said Monday that guns will not be allowed into the convention.

The petition is posing a political risk for the three remaining GOP presidential contenders. They are caught between their base as well as their own beliefs — Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) has indicated that gun-free zones invite attacks, for example — and reality. The Secret Service says it's too much of a security risk, so it's tough for candidates to argue otherwise.

We've yet to see Donald Trump do something that erodes his support, and this may be no different. But one wrong move by Cruz could put him in the unenviable position of fighting with his base in a time when he needs them more than ever.


That's it for Monday. See you Wednesday!

Monday dance. (giphy.com)

Monday dance. (giphy.com)

 
If you’re a new 5-Minute Fix reader, sign up here. If you’re a regular, forward this to anyone you think wants to sounds like they know what they’re talking about in 2016. And don’t forget to follow me on Twitter, which is where I take suggestions on gifs!

Thumb not tired yet // trying to avoid someone? Read these awesome pieces:
The 2016 campaign has moved from post-fact to pro-nonsense
Donald Trump accused Ted Cruz of a crime -- possibly based solely on random Internet rumors.
 
Obama is right about a ‘balkanized’ media problem. But he contributed to it.
The president often favors media that target particular slices of the electorate that are largely aligned with him already.
 
How LGBT activists win in states like Georgia: Emphasize economics, not just equality
Georgia's GOP governor just nixed a religious freedom bill. The reason is familiar.
 
‘Mean girls’ reading Donald Trump’s tweets works surprisingly well
Sad!
 
 
California could hand Donald Trump the GOP nomination — and then doom him on election night
A new LA Times/USC poll shows that the Golden State may giveth; also may taketh away.
 
Anthony Weiner’s remarkably candid interview about campaigning with a secret
Weiner explains his double fall from grace.
 
Donald Trump spent 100 minutes explaining his foreign policy to the New York Times. I’m still confused.
The Donald. Unfiltered. And annotated.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Recommended for you
 
Fact Checker
Count the pinocchios. A weekly review of what's true, false or in-between.
Sign Up »
 
     
 
©2016 The Washington Post, 1301 K St NW, Washington DC 20071