Global agreements on tax and international finance are so rare that it is tough to begrudge politicians for leaping on them. No surprise, then, that last week’s OECD tax deal was followed by a collective round of back–slapping and self–congratulation. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen described it as “a historic moment”. And the hyperbole was not just on this side of the Atlantic. US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen told reporters that the agreement “will stop the four-decade-long race to the bottom of corporate taxation”. It would be churlish to dismiss the agreement in its entirety. Establishing the principle that multinational firms can be taxed where they generate profit, instead of where they are located, and setting a minimum corporate tax rate of 15%, marks a step forward and will boost treasury tax revenues that have been badly hit by the Covid pandemic. Equally important is that EU legislation to put the agreement into force looks like it will be passed, and could involve other more ambitious measures to tackle tax evasion. After so many years of having its hands tied by the need for unanimity, usually by the likes of Luxembourg, Ireland, Cyprus, and Malta, all tax havens in their different ways, the EU finally has a breakthrough. But while we can welcome a move forward, it is still only a baby step. We can haggle over the level of ambition in the new tax rate or its scope. But the OECD deal has one major, irredeemable flaw: it will not significantly help the developing countries, who currently lose the most to illicit financial flows and companies gaming the tax system. Indeed, they were not even involved in the negotiations. The OECD may have a reputation as a club for wealthy countries with good intentions, but its 38 full members include no developing countries. The ‘Inclusive framework’ set up by the OECD to discuss international tax policy, only includes 27 of the 54 African states, meanwhile. |