Plus, America’s most consequential relationship and why school counselors are vital to navigating the FAFSA maze.
View in browser
Brookings Brief

February 9, 2024

U.S. Senator James Lankford speaks to a reporter in the Russell Senate Office Building in Washington, D.C.
The collapse of bipartisan immigration reform: A guide for the perplexed

 

Last October, Senate Republicans insisted that they would not back additional aid for Ukraine without a bill that would help secure America’s southern border. So, with the blessing of Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), a bipartisan team of senators began talks to produce a bill that enough members of both parties could accept.

 

The team negotiated for four months to produce a draft bill, but it took less than four days for its support among Republicans to collapse. What happened and why? William A. Galston explains the political dynamics and gives historical context for how we got here.

Read more
 

More research and commentary

 

America’s most consequential relationship? Many U.S. and Chinese leaders have referred to the relationship between the two countries as the most consequential bilateral relationship in the world. In a new written debate, experts assess whether this is actually the case and highlight the tough choices facing U.S. policymakers in dealing with China.

 

School counselors are vital to navigating the FAFSA maze. The rollout of the new Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) this year has been fraught with challenges. Katharine Meyer discusses how important school counselors are for financial aid access and provides recommendations on how to support students through FAFSA completion.

 
X/Twitter
Facebook
Instagram
LinkedIn
Brookings

The Brookings Institution,1775 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036

Unsubscribe | Manage newsletter subscriptions 

The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publication are solely those of its author(s), and do not reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its other scholars.