Apocalypse Soon: A weekly reckoning with life in a warming world—and the fight to save it

A weekly reckoning with life in a warming world—and the fight to save it

A railroad causeway divides the Great Salt Lake near Corinne, Utah. Justin Sullivan/Getty

With two weeks still to go before the official start of summer, some 22 million people in the American Southwest are forecast to face extreme heat later this week. The Coachella Valley could see record-high temperatures of up to 115 degrees, according to the Desert Sun. Las Vegas could reach 110. As municipalities rush to open cooling centers to limit heat exhaustion and heat stroke, firefighters will also need to prepare. On Monday, a new wildfire broke out in Hesperia, California, which will also be under excessive heat watch beginning tomorrow. Just yesterday, sparks from a car reportedly “dragging chains” on Interstate 15 started a new wildfire in Juab County, Utah. That’s to say nothing of the deadly whack-a-mole game officials are playing with wildfires in Arizona and New Mexico: “By the time Biden visits” New Mexico later this week, the Las Cruces Sun News recently reported, “the Black Fire will likely be the second largest in state’s history.”

 

Meanwhile, the Great Salt Lake is turning into a death trap. As Utah’s best-known water feature continues to dry up, Christopher Flavelle reports this week for The New York Times, not only will wildlife die, local ski resorts start to fail, and “lucrative” mineral extraction decline, but “the air surrounding Salt Lake City would occasionally turn poisonous. The lake bed contains high levels of arsenic and as more of it becomes exposed, wind storms carry that arsenic into the lungs of nearby residents, who make up three-quarters of Utah’s population.”

 

Each time I read apocalyptic news like this, I think of something former TNR staff writer Nick Martin pointed out: Many of the areas in the United States facing the worst, most fatal signs of climate change right now are represented by politicians doing their utmost to block emissions-reducing policies. 

 

“The American West currently faces interlocking drought and wildfire threats of unprecedented scale. And Republicans in the West are caught in a disturbing cognitive dissonance,” Nick wrote. “Of the seven Western Republican senators (not including the two from Alaska), [Utah Senator Mitt] Romney is the closest to acknowledging the urgency of climate change: The others range from casual apathy to outright denial of human-induced global warming.”

{{#if }}
 

Support Our Journalists

Our writers and editors are bringing you vital reporting, explanation, and analysis to understand the current climate crisis—but they need your help.

Here’s a special offer to subscribe to The New Republic.

—Heather Souvaine Horn, deputy editor

Try The New Republic for just $10
 
{{/if}}

Nick reviewed the positions of Wyoming Senators John Barrasso and Cynthia Lummis, Utah Senator Mike Lee, Idaho Senators Mike Crapo and Jim Risch, and Montana Senator Steve Daines, who infamously said that “to suggest that [climate change is] human-caused is not a sound scientific conclusion.” 

 

Some of Risch’s comments, Nick noted, were particularly nonsensical:

[In 2019], at a foreign policy speech given at Boise State University, … Risch was asked by a student in the crowd why it was that he never brought up the climate crisis. Risch couched his (fairly incoherent) statement in hypotheticals—“If it is as bad as the people that are on the edge of it say it is, I don’t know that there’s anything anybody can do about it,” he said. The United States, he continued, does more than its fair share, while impoverished people across the globe who have to burn their dinner over a rubber tire “don’t care about global warming.” Risch closed his answer by essentially shrugging his shoulders and telling the students, “I hope you’ll have the answer by the time we get there.

This morning, after I read The New York Times’ feature on the Great Salt Lake turning into an arsenic bomb, I returned again to Nick’s piece. When I checked the date, I was surprised to realize that he wrote these words almost exactly a year ago. It’s remarkable how little has changed, politically, while the environmental conditions worsen.

 

With that in mind, stay tuned for a piece from Liza Featherstone later this week on how some candidates this election cycle (mostly challengers) are featuring local climate conditions in their campaigns as never before. It feels particularly timely amid this week’s weather news.

 

Heather Souvaine Horn, deputy editor

 

Good News

The state of California is considering buying back water rights from the agriculture industry, to more effectively conserve water and protect vulnerable ecosystems during the worsening drought.

Bad News

Research from nonprofit group Climate Action Tracker indicates a global frenzy for new natural gas production and infrastructure rather than investment in energy efficiency measures to bring energy prices down. New gas development means more methane, which is about 80 times more potent a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide in the short term. And as a new congressional report notes this week, oil and gas companies are massively underreporting their methane leaks.

 

Stat of the Week

That’s the new record for levels of carbon dioxide in the Earth’s atmosphere (measured in parts per million), which we apparently reached last month, although the fresh data was only released last week.

 

Elsewhere in the Ecosystem

Georgia-headquartered utility Southern Company spent a stunning $62 million funding climate denial, years after learning internally that burning fossil fuels would heat the planet, a new report released from watchdog the Energy and Policy Institute indicates. Read Geoff Dembicki’s coverage of this:

Southern [Company] has now become the third-largest greenhouse gas polluter in the US due to its fleet of coal and gas-burning power plants, and until relatively recently was still denying the science behind global temperature rise. “Do you think it’s been proven that CO2 is the primary climate control knob?” the Southern Company CEO, Tom Fanning, was asked on CNBC in 2017. “No, certainly not,” he replied.…

 

The Georgia-based utility made its multimillion-dollar payments between 1993 and 2004, according to the Energy and Policy Institute’s analysis of corporate filings. It was a crucial period when aggressive US action to combat the climate crisis could have potentially made the emergency less intense than it is now. 

 

Watchdog researchers found that the electric utility paid more than $20m alone to the Edison Electric Institute, a trade group that in 1991 helped create one of the first ever media campaigns designed to “directly attack the proponents of global warming,” according to internal documents.

The Guardian | Geoff Dembicki

 

What Subscribers Are Reading

Kevin McCarthy and Garrett Graves would like you to believe they’ve a six-point strategy for lowering emissions and fuel prices. Nope!

by Kate Aronoff

 

The Build Public Renewables Act would be the first bill to pass acting on New York’s ambitious climate goals. Will Democrats kill it again?

by Kate Aronoff

 
The New Republic
Introductory offer: 50% off fearless reporting. 1 year for $10.
Donate
facebook
 
instagram
 
twitter
 

Update your personal preferences for newsletter@newslettercollector.com by clicking here

Copyright © 2022 The New Republic, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:

The New Republic 1 Union Sq W Fl 6 New York, NY 10003-3303 USA


Do you want to stop receiving all emails from TNR? Unsubscribe from this list. If you stopped getting TNR emails, update your profile to resume receiving them.