China’s digital authoritarianism, how much students are losing in the pandemic, and infrastructure spending to help the economy.
An infrastructure stimulus plan for the COVID-19 recession Infrastructure can act as an economic barrier for many people and places, but it can also function as an economic foundation for America’s COVID-19 recovery. Adie Tomer, Joseph Kane, and Lara Fishbane explain how federal policymakers can use lessons learned from past recessions to design an infrastructure stimulus plan to respond to the economic downturn. Read more | Learning losses due to COVID-19 could add up to $10 trillion “The students currently in school stand to lose $10 trillion in labor earnings over their work life. To get a sense of the magnitude, this sum is one-tenth of global GDP, or half of the annual economic output of the United States, or twice the global annual public expenditure on primary and secondary education,” write Joao Pedro Azevedo, Amer Hasan, Koen Geven, Diana Goldemberg, and Syedah Aroob Iqbal. Read more | Surveillance of religion in China The rise in digital authoritarianism and corresponding decline in human rights are two incredibly pressing issues the world faces today. In testimony for the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, Chris Meserole argues that nowhere do those issues have greater urgency than in China, where the government has relied on digital technologies to carry out human rights abuses and curtail religious freedom with unprecedented efficiency and scale. Read more |
A note on the Brookings response to COVID-19: The Brookings Institution campus in Washington, D.C. will be closed through at least September 7. For more information, read our full guidance here. As Brookings experts continue to assess the global impacts of COVID-19, read the latest analysis and policy recommendations at our coronavirus page or stay up to date with our coronavirus newsletter. | The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publication are solely those of its author(s), and do not reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its other scholars. | |