A brief word on Brexit; Thoughts on Britain’s vote for Brexit; Dangerous implications of today’s Supreme Court ruling upholding racial preferences at the University of Texas; And speaking of outlandish trademark claims . . .; Warrantless breath tests are okay after drunken driving arrests — but warrantless blood tests are not;
 
The Volokh Conspiracy
 
 
A brief word on Brexit
I hope I'm wrong, but Brexit looks like a big victory for radical Islamic fundamentalists.
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Thoughts on Britain’s vote for Brexit
Britain's vote for Brexit has major implications, and will likely cause more harm than good. But there is tremendous uncertainty about its ultimate effects.
 
Dangerous implications of today’s Supreme Court ruling upholding racial preferences at the University of Texas
The ruling is a victory for racial preferences in higher education. It seems to license wide-ranging racial discrimination in university admissions for purposes of achieving nebulous educational benefits of "diversity." However, the decision's reach may be limited in some respects.
 
And speaking of outlandish trademark claims . . .
Are the Toronto Maple Leafs seriously considering opposing rapper-turned-pot-entrepreneur Snoop Dogg's use of a "Leafs by Snoop" trademark? Really?
 
Warrantless breath tests are okay after drunken driving arrests — but warrantless blood tests are not
An important decision from the Supreme Court in Birchfield v. North Dakota.
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Recommended for you
 
Fact Checker
Count the pinocchios. A weekly review of what's true, false or in-between.
Sign Up »
 
     
 
©2016 The Washington Post, 1301 K St NW, Washington DC 20071