| Why don’t we restore the Constitution so every election is not “make or break”?; Why you shouldn’t talk to the police; Did a federal judge accuse his colleagues of letting their ‘racist attitude’ control the outcome of a case?; District court overturns magistrate decision rejecting ‘seize first, search second’ procedure for email warrants; An open letter to Volokh Conspiracy readers who are Trump supporters; Supreme Court’s new First Amendment price advertising case — can law allow ‘cash discounts’ but forbid ‘credit card surcharges’?; Supreme Court will hear ‘Slants’ trademark case, which is directly relevant to the Redskins controversy; Probable cause and cellphone searches; | | | | | | | | Probable cause and cellphone searches | | A 16-year-old confessed to committing a robbery with two other people. The police then seized his cellphone. But did the police have probable cause to believe there was evidence of crime on the phone? The court's ruling: No, they didn't. | | By Orin Kerr • Read more » |
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| ©2016 The Washington Post, 1301 K St NW, Washington DC 20071 |
|
| | | | | |
|
