Originalism and the “one person, one vote” principle; Justice Department reinstates federal program that helps state cops act like robbers; A most interesting Supreme Court lineup; Donald Trump won’t make federalism great again; Firearms law seminar;
 
The Volokh Conspiracy
 
 
Originalism and the “one person, one vote” principle
Legal scholar Earl Maltz argues that Supreme Court decisions requiring states to adhere to the "one person, one vote" principle go against the original meaning of the Constitution, and that this is a major strike against originalism. He is right on the first point, but wrong about the second.
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Justice Department reinstates federal program that helps state cops act like robbers
The Justice Department has restarted a dangerous program that routinely violates the property rights of innocent people.
 
A most interesting Supreme Court lineup
Eight justices produce a truly unusual lineup (and no majority opinion) in a case concerning the Sixth Amendment right to counsel.
Donald Trump won’t make federalism great again
In the mind of Donald Trump, is federalism even a thing? Roll the tape.
Firearms law seminar
Annual firearms law seminar will provide a full day of fun, for people who think that continuing legal education is fun.
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Recommended for you
 
Fact Checker
Count the pinocchios. A weekly review of what's true, false or in-between.
Sign Up »
 
     
 
©2016 The Washington Post, 1301 K St NW, Washington DC 20071