Did Trump truly repudiate torture and the murder of civilians?; A new personal jurisdiction case from the Texas Supreme Court (or ‘Killing Calder Softly’); 4th Circuit will reconsider en banc whether Md. ban on magazines and semiautomatics requires strict scrutiny; No constitutional right to engage in consensual BDSM sex;
 
The Volokh Conspiracy
 
 
Did Trump truly repudiate torture and the murder of civilians?
He now says he will obey the law. But that is not same thing as truly reversing his position.
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Intelligence Squared debate: Free speech is threatened on campus
A Yale audience affirms that free speech is threatened on campus.
A new personal jurisdiction case from the Texas Supreme Court (or ‘Killing Calder Softly’)
Some sensible personal jurisdiction law from the Texas Supreme Court (and another nail in the coffin for Calder v. Jones and the jurisdictional 'effects test').
4th Circuit will reconsider en banc whether Md. ban on magazines and semiautomatics requires strict scrutiny
For more on the original decision, which required strict scrutiny of the ban, read David Kopel's Feb. 4 post.
No constitutional right to engage in consensual BDSM sex
The court relies in part on (1) the absence of a "deeply rooted history or tradition of BDSM sexual activity," (2) "the absence of a history of impermissible animus as the basis for the restriction," (3) the physical risk posed by "sexual activity that involves binding and gagging or the use of physical force such as spanking or choking," and (4) "the state's interest in the protection of vulnerable persons."
 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Recommended for you
 
Fact Checker
Count the pinocchios. A weekly review of what's true, false or in-between.
Sign Up »
 
     
 
©2016 The Washington Post, 1301 K St NW, Washington DC 20071