The defender general; Ordinary investigative stop, or “extraordinary” and unlawful police tactics?; Does federal law already ban discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation?; Will Baude is back!; No, you couldn’t strip flag-burners of citizenship, even if flag-burning could be made a crime; The surprising implications of the Microsoft/Ireland warrant case; President-elect Trump wants to ban flag-burning. Here’s why the Constitution protects it.;
 
The Volokh Conspiracy
 
 
The defender general
Who is that?
Ordinary investigative stop, or “extraordinary” and unlawful police tactics?
The "parking while black" case goes to the full Seventh Circuit en banc tomorrow.
Does federal law already ban discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation?
The 7th Circuit has agreed to consider this important question en banc on Wednesday.
Will Baude is back!
I'm delighted to report that our old co-blogger Will Baude, who is a professor at the University of Chicago Law School, has returned to us.
ADVERTISEMENT
 
No, you couldn’t strip flag-burners of citizenship, even if flag-burning could be made a crime
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States" -- and this constitutional right cannot "be shifted, canceled, or diluted at the will of the Federal Government."
 
The surprising implications of the Microsoft/Ireland warrant case
The Second Circuit's email privacy decision is causing some unexpected problems.
President-elect Trump wants to ban flag-burning. Here’s why the Constitution protects it.
American law has, throughout American history, treated symbolic expression as legally equivalent to verbal expression.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Recommended for you
 
Fact Checker
Count the pinocchios. A weekly review of what's true, false or in-between.
Sign Up »
 
     
 
©2016 The Washington Post, 1301 K St NW, Washington DC 20071