The Emoluments Clause — is Donald Trump violating its letter or spirit?; Final papers posted from the George Washington Law Review’s CFAA symposium; Guilty until proven innocent, in Colorado; Short Circuit: A roundup of recent federal court decisions;
 
The Volokh Conspiracy
 
 
The Emoluments Clause — is Donald Trump violating its letter or spirit?
Professor Erik Jensen's thoughts on whether President-elect Trump's business dealings are constitutionally problematic.
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Final papers posted from the George Washington Law Review’s CFAA symposium
Here are the final papers from the symposium I helped host on the computer hacking laws.
Guilty until proven innocent, in Colorado
It is a violation of due process for Colorado to require that those whose criminal convictions have been overturned have to prove their "actual innocence" before the state will refund fees they paid as a consequence of their now-vacated convictions.
 
Short Circuit: A roundup of recent federal court decisions
Gawker’s defamatory comment section; an egregious police shooting, and an effective ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim.
Sen. Ben Sasse speaking to the Federalist Society about limited government
"If we are sincere about what we believe, it needs to be the case that we again remember what we thought two weeks ago. Which was that we need checks and balances. That we need a separation of powers."
 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Recommended for you
 
Fact Checker
Count the pinocchios. A weekly review of what's true, false or in-between.
Sign Up »
 
     
 
©2016 The Washington Post, 1301 K St NW, Washington DC 20071