‘Patents constricting the essential channels of online communication run afoul of the First Amendment’; Why don’t we restore the Constitution so every election is not “make or break”?; Why you shouldn’t talk to the police; Did a federal judge accuse his colleagues of letting their ‘racist attitude’ control the outcome of a case?;
 
The Volokh Conspiracy
 
 
‘Patents constricting the essential channels of online communication run afoul of the First Amendment’
So writes Judge Mayer of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, concurring in today's panel majority opinion in Intellectual Ventures, Inc. v. Symantec Corp..
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Why law prof Glenn Reynolds is leaving Twitter
How Twitter's political bias is ruining a good thing. And once gone, it won't be back.
Why don’t we restore the Constitution so every election is not “make or break”?
Simulation shows how a Convention of the States would actually work
Why you shouldn’t talk to the police
Watch the video of James Duane and my talks at the Cato Institute about his new book.
Did a federal judge accuse his colleagues of letting their ‘racist attitude’ control the outcome of a case?
Commenting on a recent decision, a federal judge says he crafted his dissent so as to "dramatize the racist attitude of the majority."
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Recommended for you
 
Fact Checker
Count the pinocchios. A weekly review of what's true, false or in-between.
Sign Up »
 
     
 
©2016 The Washington Post, 1301 K St NW, Washington DC 20071