When I started talking with Ellie Hall about a Nieman Lab piece on the “disappearance” of Kate Middleton, I was worried that I was being a little nuts. What if nobody but me (and, um, all my group chats) cared about this story? What if I was wrong that it was really a media story? And what was the best way to lay it all out for our readers to get them interested, too? I’m glad we went for it because Ellie’s piece, “‘This is just weird’: BuzzFeed News’ former royals reporter on Kate Middleton, Palace PR, and distrust in the media”, turned out to be everything I’d hoped it would be and more. In the words of one Redditor on r/RoyalsGossip: “It’s like a dissertation. I loved it. Finally some substantive analysis.”
And I have some great news: You will be getting even more substantive analysis from Nieman Lab than before, because this week we welcomed our two new writers. Andrew Deck and Neel Dhanesha. Andrew will be covering the intersection of generative AI and journalism for us, while Neel will be roving freely as a general staff writer but has special interest in science and climate reporting and audio. We are so happy to have them on board.
— Laura Hazard Owen
“This is just weird”: BuzzFeed News’ former royals reporter on Kate Middleton, Palace PR, and distrust in the media“I cannot emphasize enough how out of character it is that a royal press team went on the record in response to what is essentially gossip.” By Ellie Hall. |
“Don’t expect help from the disruptors”: The FT’s chief executive on AI, “loyalist” readers, and its U.S. expansionThe FT has more than 1.4 million subscribers, including more than 1 million digital subscribers. About 20% are based in the United States. By Sarah Scire. |
With Midwest expansion, the Pivot Fund tries to put grassroots news sources on philanthropy’s radar“If we really want to serve communities that are increasingly tuning us out, increasingly unsubscribing, increasingly looking the other way — my God, we’ve got to go to the communities directly.” By Sophie Culpepper. |
“Mutual incomprehension now exists seemingly everywhere”: The New York Times’ publisher responds to its critics“I don’t believe a news organization must be doing something right because people on all sides are angry. But it’s also not a sign that a news organization must be doing something wrong.” By A.G. Sulzberger. |
What happened when the Chicago Sun-Times freed the newsAfter a $61 million acquisition by public media, Chicago-Sun Times readers get free content and the newsroom has grown. But no one’s taking a victory lap for local news yet. By Jane Elizabeth. |
Facebook will stop subsidizing Australian news. Will tax dollars have to replace it?“If we accept that news is a public good, not something we can treat as a product to be traded like soap, then we have to develop economic models that somehow get the public to pay for it.” By Peter Greste. |