Claudia Rankine
i

What does it mean to want
an age-old call
for change
not to change

and yet, also,
to feel bullied
by the call to change?

How is a call to change named shame,
named penance, named chastisement?

How does one say

what if

without reproach? The root

of chastise is to make pure.
The impossibility of that—is that
what repels and not

the call for change?

 
ii

There is resignation in my voice when I say I feel
myself slowing down, gauging like a machine
the levels of my response. I remain within
so sore I think there is no other way than release—

so I ask questions like I know how
in the loneliness of my questioning.
What's still is true; there isn't even a tremor
when one is this historied out.

I could build a container to carry this being,
a container to hold all, though we were never
about completeness; we were never to be whole.

I stand in your considered thoughts also broken,
also unknown, extending
one sentence—here, I am here.
As I've known you, as I'll never know you,

I am here. Whatever is
being expressed, what if,
I am here awaiting, waiting for you

in the what if, in the questions,
in the conditionals,
in the imperatives—what if.

 
iii

What if over tea, what if on our walks, what if
in the long yawn of the fog, what if in the long middle
of the wait, what if in the passage, in the what if
that carries us each day into seasons, what if
in the renewed resilience, what if in the endlessness,
what if in a lifetime of conversations, what if
in the clarity of consciousness, what if nothing changes?

 
iv

What if you are responsible to saving more than to changing?

What if you're the destruction coursing beneath
your language of savior? Is that, too, not fucked up?

You say, if other white people had not . . . or if it seemed like
not enough . . . I would have . . .

What if—the repetitive call of what if—is only considered repetitive
when what if leaves my lips, when what if is uttered
by the unheard, and what if

what if is the cement of insistence
when you insist what if
this is.

 
v

What is it we want to keep conscious, to stay known, even as we say, each in our own way, I so love I know I shrink I'm asked I'm also I react I smell I feel I think I've been told I remember I see I didn't I thought I felt I failed I suspect I was doing I'm sure I read I needed I wouldn't I was I should've I felt I could've I never I'm sure I ask . . .


You say and I say but what
is it we are telling, what is it

we are wanting to know about here?

 
vi

What if what I want from you is new, newly made
a new sentence in response to all my questions,

a swerve in our relation and the words that carry us,
the care that carries. I am here, without the shrug,
attempting to understand how what I want
and what I want from you run parallel—

justice and the openings for just us.
from the book JUST US: AN AMERICAN CONVERSATION / Graywolf Press
READ ABOUT TODAY'S POEM
Share Share
Tweet Tweet
Forward Forward
Full-width ad. for George Mason MFA and working with Poetry Daily
CONTACT US
"On Not Walking, Part I"

"For most of my life illness has made walking difficult. Take a moment to imagine your daily round. Reduce your range to half a mile, clip that to a 150 yards – how is your world now? Does it feel whole? What would you miss most? What could you do to remedy the feelings of loss?"
 
READ ALL TODAY'S HEADLINES
Image of a human figure, outlined in stars, emerging from a blue-black sky
Poetry Daily stands with the Black community. 
We oppose racism, oppression, and police brutality.
We will continue to amplify diverse voices in the poetry world.
Black Lives Matter.
Resources for Supporting and Uplifting the Black Community
Cover image of Eva Kristina Olsson's The Angelgreen Sacrament from the original Swedish publication
What Sparks Poetry:
Johannes Göransson on "The Angelgreen Sacrament"


"In difference to the traditional lyric model, where any 'inconsistencies' make the artwork suspect, Martell argues that it is these very rifts that open the poem up, throw the reader into a 'real' of artistic encounter. I would say that Olsson’s book is a 'rifted' lyric. It’s a lyric but it goes on too long, it confuses who is reader and who is writer, who is angel and who is human. It even confuses the angel with a dress worn as a teenager."
READ THIS WEEK'S ISSUE
You have received this email because you submitted your email address at www.poems.com
If you would like to unsubscribe please click here.

© 2020 Poetry Daily, Poetry Daily, MS 3E4, 4400 University Dr., Fairfax, VA 22030

Design by the Binding Agency