A soldier of the self-proclaimed pro-Russian Lugansk People's Republic in eastern Ukraine on Dec. 19. (Alexander Ermochenko/Reuters) Red alert? You'd be forgiven for missing it after the hubbub of this weekend, but the slow-burning conflict in Ukraine seems to be flaring up again. Officials told the Associated Press on Monday that at least seven Ukrainian soldiers have been killed over the past few days as fighting intensified all along the front line in eastern Ukraine. There were also accounts of at least three pro-Russian separatist fighters killed, as well as two civilians. The fighting in Ukraine has been simmering on and off since February 2014. So far, almost 10,000 people have been killed, with a sharp uptick coming over the past several days. The chart below should help put it in context. The situation was serious enough for Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to cut short a working visit to Germany. What's really noteworthy here is the timing: The renewed fighting coincided with President Donald Trump's first official phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Saturday. During that phone call, Trump raised the possibility of lifting the sanctions against Russia that have been in place over the past few years. There’s no way to tell for sure if the call and the fighting are directly related; in fact, the official White House readout of the call didn't mention Ukraine at all. But some experts believe Putin would be willing to push the Ukrainian conflict further if he believed Trump wouldn’t react. "It's absolutely possible that the Kremlin will try to influence Ukraine more if the U.S. distances itself from the country," Igor Sutyagin, a research fellow at the London think tank Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), told NBC News just last week. There are undoubtedly complicated local factors at work as well. And with Republicans like John McCain still gunning for more sanctions on Russia, you have to wonder if the timing is really so strategic after all. But if the new administration forced the world to react to Trump this past week, Ukraine is a reminder that soon Trump may be called on to react to the world. — Adam Taylor A young boy looks out from his home in the Azraq refugee camp in Jordan. (Charles Ommanney/The Washington Post) The big question The United States isn't the only major player in the war in Syria to come under fire for its handling of refugees. Saudi Arabia and the other wealthy countries of the Persian Gulf are often criticized for not admitting more Syrians, leaving Syria’s neighbors to shoulder the burden. So we asked Liz Sly, the Post's Beirut bureau chief: why aren't the Gulf countries doing more? "The reality is somewhat complicated. None of the six countries comprising the Gulf Cooperation Council are signatories to the 1951 UN Convention on Refugees, so they don’t admit people under the standard international definition of a refugee. "These countries do admit Syrians, to varying degrees, under normal visa and immigration requirements. Saudi Arabia says it has taken in nearly 2.5 million Syrians since the war there began in 2012. If true, it would mean Saudi Arabia is hosting nearly as many Syrians as Turkey, which has 2.8 million, the largest number of any individual country. "Many are in Saudi Arabia on work permits, part of the large expatriate workforce that performs jobs from menial labor to teaching in universities. Since the war began in 2011, the kingdom has relaxed requirements on Syrians bringing in family members, which partly explains the big jump in numbers. They have also turned a blind eye to those who overstay their visas. Syrians who live there say many of their countrymen came on temporary visas to attend the annual hajj, or pilgrimage to Mecca, and simply stayed on. "But those living in Saudi Arabia are already among the more privileged Syrians, who can at least afford the price of an air ticket. The refugees living in the camps and informal settlements of Lebanon, Jordan and Turkey tend to be the poorest of the poor, who can’t afford to pay for housing or basic services yet aren’t allowed to work. They are the ones who would be targeted for resettlement in the United States under the auspices of the UN refugee agency. "Other Gulf countries have taken in almost no Syrians, and some have even made it harder for Syrians to get work permits. They have cited in justification their small size and fears of political instability should their populations grow. "Qatar’s Foreign Minister Khalid al-Attiyah defended Qatar’s refusal to admit Syrian refugees in an interview with the New Statesman in 2015, using language not dissimilar to the Trump administration. "'The immigration challenges in Qatar are unique,' he said. 'Foreign workers here already outnumber Qataris by about six to one, and a massive influx of refugees would overwhelm our native population.'" |