THE DAILY NEWSLETTER - THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 2022

Media Winners & Losers

MEDIA WINNERS:
Michael McFaul

Former Amb. Michael McFaul absolutely destroyed a BBC anchor on air for interviewing a Russian official who he said spewed “ridiculous” propaganda about the invasion of Ukraine — and asked if the BBC would have given Nazis airtime during World War II.

On BBC World Service’s Newshour, presenter Tim Franks interviewed Vitaly Milonov, a Russian MP who is bonkers even by that nation’s political standards. For four minutes, Milonov spouted Vladimir Putin’s talking points, which Franks did his best to challenge.

Franks then introduced McFaul, who was U.S. ambassador to Russia from 2012 to 2014. McFaul tore into the BBC for hosting Milonov.

"I want to ask a question," he said. "The BBC, if it was September 1st, 1939, would you put on the air a member of the Nazi Party to try to explain this ridiculous, absolute falsification of history and information that we just heard from Mr. Milonov? Because this is complete, utter nonsense what he just said, and I’m wondering if we’re doing a service to the world by giving him a voice on the BBC?"

Franks asked whether it isn't important to hear these justifications that Russian officials are using, and McFaul continued.

"Well, it’s utter nonsense, and I really want to ask the question," he said. "Let’s go back and find out was the BBC putting on Nazis on September 1st, 1939? Because I think it’s an ethical question for those that are in the business. You put him on and then you put me on. It’s here’s one view. Here’s another view, and I don’t like that."

Toward the end of their interview McFaul made his point one more time.

"First thing we need to do is we need to call things that are right and wrong, and things that are evil, and this is evil," the former ambassador said. "And Mr. Milonov was propagating evil, and we need to call that out for what it is."

On Twitter, he added another admonishment to the media: "Do not give false equivalency to voices of evil and voices of good."

It's a stark lesson and must be re-taught from time to time, that there's a difference between impartial airing of views and recklessly permitting propaganda and misinformation. The press accuse podcasters and social media of not knowing this. Many could use a refresher themselves.

MEDIA LOSER:
Laura Ingraham

"Pathetic."

As Russia moved troops, tanks, and missiles into Ukraine on Wednesday night, bringing their hit list of targets that includes President Volodymyr Zelensky and his top staff, Fox News host Laura Ingraham covered the story in part by describing an overture for peace as a "pathetic display."

It was only a short time before explosions began to rock cities across Ukraine that Zelesnky appealed to Russia, urging Putin to "stop before it's too late."

“If the Russian leadership does not want to sit at the table with us for the sake of peace, perhaps it will sit at the table with you," said Zelensky, addressing the Russian people directly. "Do Russians want war? I would very much like to answer this question, but the answer depends on you, the citizens of the Russian Federation.”

Ingraham, who was interviewing ex-president Donald Trump at the time, had briefly interrupted her discussion with the former president to air part of an emergency meeting of the U.N. Security Council. That meeting featured an historic moment when the Ukrainian ambassador spoke forcefully to the Russian ambassador, who is currently serving as president of the Security Council.

“We had a, kind of a really, pathetic display from the Ukrainian president – Zelensky – earlier today, President Trump, where he – in Russian, he doesn’t like to speak Russian, but in Russian – he was essentially imploring Vladimir Putin not to invade his country," said Ingraham. She then ridiculously described the Ukrainian ambassador as looking "looking like a defeated man" before asking an actually defeated man, Trump, for his "final reaction.”

Trump said the invasion wouldn’t have happened if he were still president. It is a strange answer considering how big a fan of the invasion Trump has become.

“We will be defending ourselves,” Zelensky said in his speech non-pathetically, telling Russia, “As you attack, it will be our faces you see, not our backs.”

There were also other preposterous moments during the show.

"Pathetic" is not wholly inappropriate a description. It just needed to be applied inward, not outward in this case.

The A-Block

'That's a F***ing Missile!'

A massive surge of photos and videos have been posted online from Ukraine as the country faces an ongoing assault from Russian military forces.

The footage and images that are pouring out of Ukraine are by turns shocking, distressing, tragic, hopeful, fearful ... it's what it's like to see war unfold through the eyewitness of technology and the voices of the displaced and the endangered. We can only offer a glimpse of the sights and sounds that encompass conflict and war. Yet it's important to see not just for history's sake, but our own.

Because each war is its own apocalypse, and we must never forget in the partisan scramble or the battles of hindsight that the cost of war is human beings. Families. Homes. Humanity.

We should witness what we can stand to see of the conflict about which we will all be writing and talking and arguing. 

No, it's not possible for our article to share everything that has come out, and none of us can know yet whether things will get worse or somehow get better. But it's worth seeing right now, either here, or on your television, or on social media, or even from family or friends who are there.

See it and hear it. And pray for them. 


In Other News...

As CPAC Kicks Off in Orlando, New Poll Shows Florida Republicans Prefer DeSantis Over Trump for 2024

Reporter Who Speaks Six Different Languages Explains How He Does It In First Interview Since Going Viral

Newsmax Host Suggests Russia's Invasion of Ukraine is Fake: 'Smells Fishy to Me'

RATINGS: Three CNN Shows CrossMillion Viewer Mark

Must See Clip

Grossest Ad of the Year - And It's Only February

A congressional candidate in Colorado unleashed a sh*tstorm on Wednesday by dropping a deuce doozy of a campaign ad featuring turds falling from the sky.

Alex Walker is one of a slew of Democrats vying for the party nomination in the state’s third congressional district. The seat is currently held by Rep. Lauren Boebert, the freshman congresswoman who’s gained quite a reputation in a short period of time.

Walker’s two-minute ad begins when an unsuspecting woman is suddenly crushed by a giant pile of shit that falls from the sky.

Seriously. Not for weak stomachs.

Links We Like

Young Americans More Supportive of Cancel Culture, Also More Afraid of It
- Robby Soave, Reason
The West Must Show Putin How Wrong He Is to Choose War
- Richard N. Haass, New York Times
While Most People Sleep, Some Ultra-Introverts Revel in Lives of Quiet Solitude
- Faith Hill, The Atlantic
The Erasure of JK Rowling
- Simon Evans, Spiked
Reading this online? Why not get it in your inbox? Sign up for the Mediaite Live from the Greenroom Newsletter today!
Twitter Twitter
Facebook Facebook
Instagram Instagram
Visit Mediaite Visit Mediaite
Copyright © 2021 Mediaite LLC All rights reserved.

Write to us:  tips@mediaite.com

Problems with these e-mails? Update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.