The New York Times / Sapna Maheshwari and Mike Isaac
Instagram’s uneasy rise as a news site →“My friends who are millennial moms are busy — they have jobs, they have kids, they have to put food on the table,” said Emily Amick, a lawyer and Instagram influencer who considers herself an “at-large opinion editor” on the platform. “They don’t have tons of extra time to consume news, and they were already on Instagram. So this is the way for them to be able to consume news through a modality they’re already using.”
The Washington Post / Jeremy Barr
How everything became a “psyop” for conservative media →“The cynical genius of calling something a ‘psyop’ is that such accusations ‘don’t really need to have any evidence, because there’s not going to be any evidence: It’s a secret operation,'” said Mike Rothschild, an expert in conspiracy theories who wrote a book on QAnon.
The Indianapolis Star / Holly Hays
Press Gazette / Charlotte Tobitt
Reuters / Anna Tong, Echo Wang and Martin Coulter
Reddit in AI content licensing deal with Google, sources say →“Social media platform Reddit has struck a deal with Google to make its content available for training the search engine giant’s artificial intelligence models, three people familiar with the matter said. The contract with Alphabet-owned Google is worth about $60 million per year, according to one of the sources.”
The Nation / Emmet Fraizer
Scroll.in / Waqas Ejaz and Mitali Mukherjee
Substack / Richard J. Tofel
A requiem for the culture of The Wall Street Journal →“What I am saying is that treating people in newsrooms callously is always wrong, and that institutions where this happens repeatedly become coarsened and brittle. Editors and managers who behave badly, or even those who tolerate others doing so, are unlikely, at least in my experience, to possess the empathy that marks much of great journalism.”
Ars Technica / Timothy B. Lee and James Grimmelmann
Why The New York Times might win its copyright lawsuit against OpenAI →“AI companies are on shakier legal ground than Google was in its book search case. And the courts don’t always side with technology companies in cases where companies make copies to build their systems. The story of MP3.com illustrates the kind of legal peril AI companies could face in the coming years.”
Detroit Free Press / Dana Afana