Nieman Lab / Joshua Benton
What would Project 2025 do for (or to) journalism? →“The federal government can intersect with any part of the journalism process — from how stories get reported to the platforms they’re distributed on to the business models that pay the bills. What does Project 2025 have in mind for an institution it doesn’t seem to have much affection for?”
Reuters / Michelle Conlin
The Atlantic / Charlie Warzel
X is a white-supremacist site →“As I was preparing to write this story, I visited some of the most vile corners of the internet. I’ve monitored these spaces for years, and yet this time, I was struck by how little distance there was between them and what X has become. It is impossible to ignore: The difference between X and a known hateful site such as Gab are people like myself….We are the human shield of respectability that keeps Musk’s disastrous $44 billion investment from being little more than an algorithmically powered Stormfront.”
Columbia Journalism Review / Jon Allsop
At war, because we’re at work →“Already, there is
chatter among some observers that the heightened mass outrage and interest of Trump’s first term—which drove eyeballs and subscriptions to organizations producing hard-hitting journalism, and energized the journalism itself—won’t be repeated this time; that exhaustion and apathy might reign instead. If that is indeed to be the case, then it will pose some very sharp questions for the business of news—or rather, intensify questions we’re already grappling with.”
The Hollywood Reporter / Georg Szalai
Press Gazette / Charlotte Tobitt
The New York Times / Michael M. Grynbaum and John Koblin
TV networks prepared for a long wait that didn’t come →“Unlike four years ago, anchors were not forced to delve into the minutiae of absentee ballot counts and arcane legal challenges. The legal pundits on retainer at the networks stayed on the sidelines. The trend lines were clear — and some anchors picked up on the direction of the results earlier than others.”