Explainer: What you should know about the Electoral CollegeOn Tuesday, Americans will go to the polls to finish casting their ballots for the 2020 election. But while that will complete the process for many of the offices they are voting for (such as for Senators or state legislatures), it is merely the first step in the Electoral College process that is used to elect the President and Vice President of the United States. Here is what you should know about that process. What is the Electoral College? Although the term “Electoral College” is never used in the Constitution (Article 2, Section 1, Clauses 2 and 3), the electors that choose the President at each election are traditionally called a College (meaning a group of people organized toward a common goal). The Electoral College was proposed by James Wilson, a leading constitutional lawyer among the Founding Fathers, at the Constitutional Convention. Wilson’s plan was offered as a compromise between those who wanted the Congress to choose the president and those who believed the election should be decided by the state legislatures. The Framers were generally in agreement against giving the people the power to directly elect the president. This Week at the ERLC
What You Need to Read
![]() News From Capitol HillThis week, Amy Coney Barrett was confirmed by a vote of 52 to 48 in the U.S. Senate to be an Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Commending the final confirmation vote, Russell Moore urged prayer for Justice Barrett, her new colleagues in the nation’s highest court, and the Barrett family:
Here is our explainer on what you need to know about Justice Barrett and key rulings from her time on the 7th Circuit. To learn more, check out this article from Josh Wester exploring her judicial philosophy, “according to Barrett, originalists ‘insist that judges must adhere to the original public meeting of the Constitution’s text.’” Of the cases on the Supreme Court’s docket in November and December, next week for oral arguments will be heard in Fulton v. Philadelphia, a case on foster care and religious freedom. The ERLC filed an amicus brief this summer with a wide range of religious institutions arguing that the Court’s decision in Oregon v. Smith should be reconsidered because of its disastrous effect on religious freedom. For more on the case ahead of next week’s arguments, here is a snapshot from our friends at Becket, who are representing the foster moms:
On the WeeklyTech podcast, Dan Darling joins Jason Thacker to talk about his latest book A Way with Words and what it looks like to apply biblical wisdom to our engagement with social media. Dan and Jason discuss ways that we can have a healthier relationship with social media in this cultural moment. On the Capitol Conversations podcast, Jeff Pickering and Chelsea Sobolik welcome Yuval Levin of the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) to the roundtable to talk about the fractures in America public life and the way forward. Levin’s work in recent years have been instrumental to many of us here at the ERLC in thinking well about what has gone wrong in the public square and to see clearly why now is a time to build toward renewal. From The Public SquareHow conservative South Dakota could be at the forefront of legalizing marijuana
Will $335 Million Peace with Israel Secure Sudan’s Religious Freedom?
Polish High Court Outlaws Abortion for Fetal Disability
New Research Shows Religious Liberty Drives Human Flourishing – And Why This Matters Now More Than Ever
|