When President Trump and Congress come back to Washington in January, will infrastructure be first on the to-do list? My new piece for the magazine looks at the White House’s plans for building new roads and bridges. Here’s an excerpt: . . .with the Obamacare repeal (a failure) and tax reform (a success) done, the White House is planning to release an infrastructure proposal in the first few weeks of the new year. Trump has met several times in the last month with congressional leaders about finalizing a framework. Trump has a personal interest in the issue. “He really understands building stuff,” says Pennsylvania’s Bill Shuster, the chairman of the House transportation and infrastructure committee, who met with Trump in the Oval Office on December 11. “The guy’s a builder, he knows how to build things on time and under budget.” According to White House officials, the forthcoming plan will expand on Trump’s executive orders speeding up the permitting process for projects, and the president hopes for something on the order of $1 trillion in total investment. This includes $220 billion in federal spending for roads, bridges, and similar projects, with the balance coming from investment by state, local, and private interests. |
|
|
Looking Back and Looking Forward: Terrorism— When it comes to fighting violent extremism abroad, President Donald Trump’s first year has seen some success: partnering with Middle-Eastern nations to tamp down terror groups in their countries, continuing to squeeze ISIS out of the land they seized during 2014 and 2015 in Iraq and Syria, and recapturing the key city of Mosul in July. Although annihilating a decentralized terror group may be impossible, a White House official said Thursday that “a physical caliphate will soon be extinguished.” Meanwhile, the administration’s travel restrictions are still being contested in the courts, although the Supreme Court ruled in December the ban could go into effect while its case was being tried. |
|
|
Vice President Watch—Mike Pence made an unannounced visit to Afghanistan Thursday. The vice president is the highest ranking U.S. official in the Trump administration to visit the country, where American and coalition forces have been fighting since 2001. Pence rallied with U.S. service members at Bagram Air Base and met with Afghanistan’s president, Ashraf Ghani, in Kabul. |
|
|
Photo of the Day Mike Pence poses for photos with troops in a hangar at Bagram Air Field in Afghanistan on December 21, 2017. (MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images) |
|
|
Must-Read of the Day—From Gabriel Sherman’s profile of Steve Bannon at Vanity Fair: “It was the evening of November 14, and the president’s former chief strategist flew to Japan to deliver a hard-edged anti-China speech at a conference for human-rights activists. ‘I’m not really a human-rights guy,’ he told me as we boarded the plane in New York. ‘But this is a chance to talk to them about populism.’” There’s a lot more in Sherman’s piece, which is worth the full read. |
|
|
Looking Back and Looking Forward: Immigration—Congress is likely to tackle immigration reform early next year, racing against a timeline set by President Trump’s September decision to end the Obama-era program that granted legal status to people brought illegally to America as children. Unless Congress reinstates it, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals will sunset in March, a fact Republicans hope to use to extract Democratic concessions on increased border security and laws regulating legal immigration. But any deal would require either the White House or Democratic leaders to back down on one key sticking point: a border wall between the U.S. and Mexico, which was Trump’s key immigration promise during the campaign. Democratic leaders have insisted that the wall is a non-starter, while the White House has insisted it is a necessary precondition for a DACA deal. Democrats may have cause to view Trump’s stance as a bluff: In September, he tweeted that his administration would “revisit” DACA if Congress failed to find a compromise. Then again, Democrats have blinked on the issue once already, earlier this week backing down from their pledge to force a government shutdown if Republicans refused to reinstate DACA this year. |
|
|
Who is Bill Kristol’s 2017 Person of the Year? It’s actually three people: Publius, the pseudonym of the three authors of the Federalist Papers. Here’s a bit from Kristol’s editorial in the new issue: 2017 was a year in which American politics vindicated Publius’s prediction that “enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm.” It was a year that demonstrated in spades Publius’s judgment that “So numerous indeed and so powerful are the causes which serve to give a false bias to the judgment, that we, upon many occasions, see wise and good men on the wrong as well as on the right side of questions of the first magnitude to society.” And it was a year in which Publius’s prediction of what would happen in 1787 was repeated, 230 years later: “A torrent of angry and malignant passions will be let loose. To judge from the conduct of the opposite parties, we shall be led to conclude that they will mutually hope to evince the justness of their opinions, and to increase the number of their converts by the loudness of their declamations and the bitterness of their invectives.” But in the midst of these passions and declamations and invectives, one set of institutions has stood tall: those created by, derived from, and fostered by the Constitution of the United States. The separation of powers, the independence of the courts, the rule of law, federalism, limits on government power, an independent private sector and a vigorous civil society, basic freedoms of speech and assembly—these have survived the rocky seas of 2017, despite having at the helm of the American ship a captain who is careless of its well-being and reckless in its piloting. The survival of that ship, the fact that it remains seaworthy and even in some instances is moving in the right direction, is a tribute to many individuals, but to Publius above all. He and his colleagues built well. They knew that “If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary.” And they knew that “A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions.” |
|
|
Programming Note—Today’s is the last White House Watch until 2018. We’re taking a break for the holidays, but if any big White House news breaks in the meantime, watch this space for updates. Otherwise, look for White House Watch to return on January 2. Merry Christmas and all the best to you and yours. |
|
|
| View this email as a webpage. | This email was sent by: The Weekly Standard
| We respect your right to privacy - view our policy | Unsubscribe | © Copyright 2015-2018 The Weekly Standard. All Rights Reserved
|
|
|
|