Plus, why everyone exaggerates climate finance, and estimating the economic impacts of legislation.
November 8, 2024 Editor’s note: Thank you for reading the Brookings Brief. We are going on a short hiatus for the Veterans Day holiday in the United States. Look out for the next edition of the newsletter in your inbox on Tuesday, November 12. |
| Women favored abortion rights but not Harris Many expected that a political gender gap in favor of Kamala Harris would counterbalance her weaknesses in other parts of the electorate and help Harris win. Elaine Kamarck discusses why this ultimately did not come to pass, including the role of ballot initiatives on abortion and Donald Trump’s position on a federal abortion ban. |
A key point “Although Harris fared much better among women than men, according to election exit polls, she ended up doing no better than Biden with women. That torpedoed her strategy of emphasizing reproductive rights—and in the end helped to elect Donald Trump.” — Elaine Kamarck |
More research and commentary Why everyone exaggerates climate finance. Are countries overstating how much money they need to tackle the climate crisis? Rahul Tongia explains what is happening and argues that overstating the numbers leads to unachievable targets and distracts from where efforts should be focused. The value of dynamic scoring for legislators. On a new episode of the Brookings Podcast on Economic Activity, Wendy Edelberg, Douglas Elmendorf, and R. Glenn Hubbard explore how nonpartisan agencies estimate the potential economic impacts of legislation under consideration by Congress and the tradeoffs between different techniques for evaluation. |
| About Brookings The Brookings Institution is a nonprofit organization based in Washington, D.C. Our mission is to conduct in-depth, nonpartisan research to improve policy and governance at local, national, and global levels. If you were forwarded this email, sign up for the Brookings Brief to stay updated on our latest work. |
The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publication are solely those of its author(s), and do not reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its other scholars. |
|
